...
首页> 外文期刊>Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts: Section of Biological and Medical Sciences >CONTINUOUS FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK VERSUS FASCIA ILIACA COMPARTMENT BLOCK AS POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS WITH HIP FRACTURE
【24h】

CONTINUOUS FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK VERSUS FASCIA ILIACA COMPARTMENT BLOCK AS POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS WITH HIP FRACTURE

机译:连续股神经阻滞对比筋膜筋膜I裂阻滞作为髋关节骨折术后术后镇痛

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Systemic postoperative analgesia is inefficient in most patients with hip fracture, which is the reason for pain, especially during leg movement. Peripheral and plexus nerve blocks are an efficient option for postoperative pain relief. The aim of this study was to compare the effect and duration of continuous FNB versus a single FIC block as a postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture. Methods: Sixty patients with hip fracture were included and were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 patients: FNB group – patients with continuous femoral nerve block; and FIC group –patients with a single fascia iliaca compartment block. In all patients, pain intensity was measured at rest and in passive leg movement by using VDS (0–4) at several intervals: 1, 2, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after intervention. The amount of supplemental analgesia was measured, together with the time when the patient needed it for the first time, as well as the side effects. Results: The values of VDS were significantly lower in patients with FNB block versus patients with FIC block in rest and movement at the 24 hour intervals (46.67% vs 0% felt moderate pain), after 36 hours (43.33% vs 0% felt moderate pain) and 48 hours after intervention (46.67% vs 3.33% felt moderate to severe pain) for p < 0.05. Patients with FNB block received a significantly lower amount of supplemental analgesia, 23.3% of the FNB group vs 50% of the FIC group (p < 0.05). Registered side effects were were nausea, dizziness and sedation, and they were statistically significantly more frequent in the FIC group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Pain relief in the postoperative period was superior in the FNB group versus the FIC group at rest and in movement in patients with hip fracture.
机译:简介:大多数髋部骨折患者术后全身镇痛效果不佳,这是造成疼痛的原因,尤其是在腿部运动期间。周围和丛神经阻滞是术后缓解疼痛的有效选择。这项研究的目的是比较连续性FNB与单次FIC阻滞作为髋部骨折患者术后镇痛的效果和持续时间。方法:纳入60例髋部骨折患者,将其随机分为两组,每组30例:FNB组–连续性股神经阻滞患者;和FIC组–单个fa肌筋膜室阻滞的患者。在所有患者中,在多个时间间隔(干预后1、2、12、24、36和48小时)使用VDS(0–4)测量休息和腿部被动运动时的疼痛强度。测量了辅助镇痛的量,以及患者第一次需要镇痛的时间以及副作用。结果:36小时后,FNB阻滞患者在24小时间隔休息和运动时的VDS值显着低于FIC阻滞患者(46.67%vs 0%感到中度疼痛)(43.33%vs 0%感到中度疼痛)疼痛)和干预后48小时(46.67%对3.33%感到中度至重度疼痛),p <0.05。 FNB阻滞患者接受的辅助镇痛剂量明显较低,FNB组为23.3%,而FIC组为50%(p <0.05)。登记的副作用为恶心,头晕和镇静,在FIC组中,其发生率在统计学上显着更高(p <0.05)。结论:髋关节骨折患者在休息和运动时,FNB组术后疼痛缓解优于FIC组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号