首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology Report >Comparative study of endoscopy vs. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of gastric variceal bleeding
【24h】

Comparative study of endoscopy vs. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of gastric variceal bleeding

机译:内镜与经颈肝内门体分流术治疗胃静脉曲张破裂出血的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aim: Gastric varices are associated with high mortality. There have been conflicting reports on whether endoscopic treatment with cyanoacrylate or the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is more effective in the treatment of gastric varices. We compared the outcomes of patients treated with cyanoacrylate glue or TIPS for the management of acute gastric variceal bleeding. Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing either TIPS or endoscopic treatment with cyanoacrylate for acute gastric variceal bleeding at our institution from 2001 to 2011. Primary compared to studied between the two treatment modalities were the short-term treatment outcomes, including re-bleeding within 30 days, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 169 patients were included in the analysis. The TIPS arm contained 140 patients and the cyanoacrylate arm contained 29 patients. There was no evidence to suggest any significant differences in demographics or disease severity. There were no differences between the TIPS arm and the cyanoacrylate armtwo groups in treatment outcomes including re-bleeding within 30 days (17.4% vs. 17.2%; P = 0.98), median length of stay in the hospital (4.5 days vs. 6.0 days; P = 0.35) or in-hospital mortality (9.0% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.74). In-hospital mortality was evaluated for 149 patients and lower albumin (P = 0.015), higher MELD score (P 0.001), higher CTP score (P = 0.005) and bleeding (P = 0.008) were all significantly associated with in-hospital death. Conclusion: These findings suggest that both treatments are equally effective. Cyanoacrylate offers a safe, effective alternative to TIPS for gastric varices, and physician may choose the best therapy for each patient, factoring in the availability of TIPS or cyanoacrylate, the individual patient's presentation, and cost.
机译:背景与目的:胃静脉曲张与高死亡率有关。关于用氰基丙烯酸酯内窥镜治疗或经颈静脉内肝内门体分流术(TIPS)放置在胃静脉曲张治疗中是否更有效的报道存在矛盾。我们比较了使用氰基丙烯酸酯胶或TIPS治疗急性胃静脉曲张破裂出血的患者预后。方法:该研究旨在回顾性队列分析2001年至2011年在我院接受TIPS或内镜下使用氰基丙烯酸酯治疗急性胃静脉曲张破裂出血的患者。与两种治疗方式之间的初步比较是短期治疗结果,包括30天内再次出血,住院时间长短和院内死亡率。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析以评估与院内死亡率相关的因素。结果:总共169例患者被纳入分析。 TIPS组包含140例患者,氰基丙烯酸酯组包含29例患者。没有证据表明人口统计学或疾病严重程度有任何显着差异。 TIPS组和氰基丙烯酸酯组之间在治疗结局方面无差异,包括30天内再次出血(17.4%比17.2%; P = 0.98),住院时间中位数(4.5天比6.0天)。 ; P = 0.35)或院内死亡率(9.0%比11.1%; P = 0.74)。评估了149例患者的院内死亡率,较低的白蛋白(P = 0.015),较高的MELD评分(P <0.001),较高的CTP评分(P = 0.005)和出血(P = 0.008)均与医院内显着相关死亡。结论:这些发现表明两种治疗方法均有效。氰基丙烯酸盐是TIPS替代治疗胃底静脉曲张的一种安全有效的方法,考虑到TIPS或氰基丙烯酸酯的可用性,患者的病情和费用,医生可能会为每位患者选择最佳疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号