...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Immunology >Protecting the Borders: Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells on the Front Line
【24h】

Protecting the Borders: Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells on the Front Line

机译:保护边界:第一线的组织驻留性记忆T细胞

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This research topic of Frontiers in Immunology focuses on T cells residing in mucosal tissues and is dedicated to a pioneer in the field, Leo Lefrancois. As mucosal tissues are the major portals of pathogen entry, the generation and functions of tissue-resident T cells are crucial for mediating protection and immune homeostasis at these sites. Unlike previously described T cell subsets, these tissue-resident T cells exhibit regional specificity with minimal systemic migration, most being previously activated or memory T cells. While tissue-resident memory T cells (Trm) display some overlapping phenotypes with other circulating T cell subsets, their origins and developmental pathways remain elusive.The most extensively described tissue-resident T cells are those present in intestines, lung, and skin. While CD8 Trm derived from these mucosal tissues express core genetic profiles ( 1 ), unique patterns also exist, suggesting some tissue-specific programing in situ . Reviews in this issue by Shane et al. ( 2 ) and Mueller et al. ( 3 ) highlight the role of the respiratory and cutaneous microenvironment, respectively, on full commitment to the Trm lineage. Both reviews describe the cellular interactions and other regional cues that may support Trm differentiation and sublocalization ( 2 , 3 ). Interestingly, dependency on cytokines and lifespan differs between these sites suggesting that not all Trm are equal. These and many other studies reviewed in this issue analyze Trm cells after tissues dissociation. Unfortunately, this approach isolates only a fraction of immune cells present in situ and, importantly, fails to reveal spatiotemporal cell–cell interactions. Undeniably, studies using microscopy allow one to gain a better perspective of the dynamics of T cells motility and migration patterns within the unique architecture of specific tissues. Benechet et al. ( 4 ) reviews the literature that has utilized various imaging technologies to decipher the migration activities of T cells. Future analysis of unperturbed Trm within their privileged niche will likely reveal unappreciated interactions and behaviors that improve our understanding of Trm biology.Most studies investigating Trm focus on CD8 T cells; however, pathogen-specific CD4 Trm in mucosal tissues have also been discovered. In this issue, three reviews cover CD4 T cells starting with a global description of mucosal resident CD4 T cells presented by Turner and Farber ( 5 ). This is followed by a more focused description of the CD4 T cell responses resulting from encounters with intracellular bacteria, such as Salmonella and Chlamydia, which invade the intestines and female reproductive tract, respectively ( 6 ). Lastly, Gratz and Campbell ( 7 ) provide a new paradigm that includes T regulatory cells (Treg) among subsets of Trm. Indeed, Treg are enriched in the mucose to maintain a tolerogenic environment.To understand the normal forces exerted on mucosal resident T cells, knowledge of the unique microenvironment inhabited by these T cells is essential. Despite the inherent tolerogenic nature of the mucosa, pathogen exposure and associated inflammation overrides the naturally suppressive environment, promoting Trm development. Inflammatory cytokines regulate the expression of chemokine receptors and other homing molecules to promote the migration of effector T cells to distinct locations where they will commit to the Trm lineage. Kim and Harty ( 8 ) highlight the effects of inflammatory cytokines present during different stages of the immune response on resultant CD8 T cell differentiation. Specifically, they describe an unappreciated role of IL-15, which promotes trafficking to inflamed tissues as well as the contrasting roles of TGF-β in the formation and retention of Trm. In addition to infection, commensal bacteria also likely influence Trm cells. The review by Spasova and Surh ( 9 ) describes how the gut microbiota is sensed by pattern recognition receptors such as TLR and NOD-like receptors. Subsequently, how unique immune cells populations highly represented in the intestines (ILC, specific subsets of DCs, Th17, Tregs, and IEL) interpret these signals and influence the gut microenvironment, including the persistence and functions of Trm, is also discussed. Together, these reviews draw attention to the complexity of specific microenvironments and their impact on Trm development and function.While improving our knowledge of Trm will surely help to develop better clinical strategies to promote mucosal immunity, Sowell and Marzo ( 10 ) suggest that we should proceed with caution. In their opinion piece, they suggest that Trm may be refractory or inhibited by certain strategies, which modify conventional memory T cell responses, and vice versa. This is exemplified by inhibition of mTOR signaling that enhances memory T cell generation at the expense of effector T cell accumulation in the mucosa. As such, understanding how to specifically enhance develop
机译:免疫学前沿的这一研究主题着重于粘膜组织中的T细胞,并致力于该领域的先驱Leo Lefrancois。由于粘膜组织是病原体进入的主要门户,因此组织驻留性T细胞的产生和功能对于在这些部位介导保护和免疫稳态是至关重要的。与先前描述的T细胞亚群不同,这些组织驻留T细胞表现出区域特异性,而系统性迁移最少,大多数是先前激活或记忆的T细胞。虽然组织驻留记忆T细胞(Trm)与其他循环T细胞亚群表现出一些重叠的表型,但它们的起源和发育途径仍然难以捉摸。最广泛描述的组织驻留T细胞是肠,肺和皮肤中存在的那些。来自这些粘膜组织的CD8 Trm表达核心遗传图谱(1),但也存在独特的模式,表明某些组织特异性原位编程。 Shane等人在本期中的评论。 (2)和Mueller等。 (3)分别强调呼吸和皮肤微环境在完全致力于Trm谱系方面的作用。两项综述均描述了细胞相互作用和其他可能支持Trm分化和亚定位的区域性提示(2,3)。有趣的是,这些部位之间对细胞因子和寿命的依赖性不同,这表明并非所有Trm都相等。在本期中回顾的这些和许多其他研究分析了组织解离后的Trm细胞。不幸的是,这种方法只能分离出原位存在的免疫细胞的一部分,而且重要的是,它无法揭示时空细胞间的相互作用。不可否认,使用显微镜进行的研究使人们可以更好地了解特定组织独特结构内T细胞运动的动力学和迁移模式。 Benechet等。 (4)回顾了利用各种成像技术破译T细胞迁移活动的文献。未来对处于特权地位的Trm的扰动分析可能会揭示出未被理解的相互作用和行为,从而增进我们对Trm生物学的了解。然而,还发现了粘膜组织中的病原体特异性CD4 Trm。在本期杂志中,三篇综述涵盖了CD4 T细胞,首先是Turner和Farber(5)对粘膜驻留CD4 T细胞的全面描述。接下来是对CD4 T细胞反应的更集中描述,这种反应是由分别侵袭肠和女性生殖道的细胞内细菌(如沙门氏菌和衣原体)引起的(6)。最后,Gratz和Campbell(7)提供了一种新的范例,其中包括Trm子集中的T调节细胞(Treg)。的确,Treg富含粘液以维持致耐受环境。要了解施加在粘膜常驻T细胞上的正常作用力,了解这些T细胞所处的独特微环境至关重要。尽管粘膜具有固有的致耐受性,但病原体暴露和相关的炎症仍会覆盖自然抑制环境,从而促进Trm的发育。炎性细胞因子调节趋化因子受体和其他归巢分子的表达,从而促进效应T细胞迁移到不同的位置,从而使它们参与Trm谱系。 Kim和Harty(8)强调了在免疫应答的不同阶段存在的炎性细胞因子对最终CD8 T细胞分化的影响。具体而言,他们描述了IL-15的未知功能,该功能可促进向发炎组织的运输,以及TGF-β在Trm形成和保留中的相反作用。除感染外,共生细菌还可能影响Trm细胞。 Spasova和Surh(9)的综述描述了模式识别受体(例如TLR和NOD样受体)如何感测肠道菌群。随后,还讨论了如何在肠道中高度代表独特的免疫细胞群(ILC,DC的特定子集,Th17,Tregs和IEL)解释这些信号并影响肠道微环境,包括Trm的持久性和功能。综上所述,这些评论引起人们对特定微环境的复杂性及其对Trm发育和功能的影响的关注。虽然我们对Trm的了解将肯定有助于制定更好的临床策略来促进粘膜免疫,但Sowell和Marzo(10)建议谨慎行事。在他们的观点中,他们认为Trm可能是难治性的或被某些改变其常规记忆T细胞反应的策略所抑制,反之亦然。这可以通过抑制mTOR信号传递来举例说明,该信号增强了记忆T细胞的生成,但损害了粘膜中效应T细胞的积累。因此,了解如何特别促进发展

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号