首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Microbiology >Comparison of the Microbiological Quality and Safety between Conventional and Organic Vegetables Sold in Malaysia
【24h】

Comparison of the Microbiological Quality and Safety between Conventional and Organic Vegetables Sold in Malaysia

机译:马来西亚出售的传统蔬菜和有机蔬菜的微生物质量和安全性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Given the remarkable increase of public interest in organic food products, it is indeed critical to evaluate the microbiological risk associated with consumption of fresh organic produce. Organic farming practices including the use of animal manures may increase the risk of microbiological contamination as manure can act as a vehicle for transmission of foodborne pathogens. This study aimed to determine and compare the microbiological status between organic and conventional fresh produce at the retail level in Malaysia. A total of 152 organic and conventional vegetables were purchased at retail markets in Malaysia. Samples were analyzed for mesophilic aerobic bacteria, yeasts and molds, and total coliforms using conventional microbiological methods. Combination methods of most probable number-multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPN-mPCR) were used to detect and quantify foodborne pathogens, including Escherichia coli O157:H7, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Salmonella Enteritidis. Results indicated that most types of organic and conventional vegetables possessed similar microbial count ( P > 0.05) of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, yeasts and molds, and total coliforms. E. coli O157:H7 and S . Typhimurium were not detected in any sample analyzed in this study. Among the 152 samples tested, only the conventional lettuce and organic carrot were tested positive for STEC and S . Enteritidis, respectively. L. monocytogenes were more frequently detected in both organic (9.1%) and conventional vegetables (2.7%) as compared to E. coli O157:H7, S . Typhimurium, and S . Enteritidis. Overall, no trend was shown that either organically or conventionally grown vegetables have posed greater microbiological risks. These findings indicated that one particular type of farming practices would not affect the microbiological profiles of fresh produce. Therefore, regardless of farming methods, all vegetables should be subjected to appropriate post-harvest handling practices from farm to fork to ensure the quality and safety of the fresh produce.
机译:鉴于公众对有机食品的兴趣显着增加,评估与食用新鲜有机产品有关的微生物风险确实至关重要。有机耕作方法(包括使用动物粪便)可能会增加微生物污染的风险,因为粪便可以充当食源性病原体传播的媒介。这项研究旨在确定和比较马来西亚零售水平的有机和常规新鲜农产品之间的微生物状况。在马来西亚的零售市场上总共购买了152种有机和常规蔬菜。使用常规微生物学方法分析样品的嗜温性好氧细菌,酵母和霉菌以及大肠菌群。最可能的数量-多重聚合酶链反应(MPN-mPCR)的组合方法用于检测和定量食源性病原体,包括大肠杆菌O157:H7,产志贺毒素的大肠杆菌(STEC),单核细胞增多性李斯特菌,鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和肠炎沙门氏菌。结果表明,大多数类型的有机蔬菜和常规蔬菜的嗜温性好氧细菌,酵母和霉菌以及大肠菌群的微生物计数相似(P> 0.05)。大肠杆菌O157:H7和S。在这项研究中分析的任何样品中均未检出鼠伤寒。在152个测试样品中,只有常规生菜和有机胡萝卜的STEC和S呈阳性。肠炎分别。与大肠杆菌O157:H7,S相比,在有机蔬菜(9.1%)和常规蔬菜(2.7%)中更常见单核细胞增生李斯特菌。鼠伤寒和S。肠炎。总体而言,未发现有机或常规种植的蔬菜具有更大的微生物风险的趋势。这些发现表明,一种特殊的耕作方式不会影响新鲜农产品的微生物特性。因此,无论采用哪种种植方式,所有蔬菜从农场到餐桌都要接受适当的收获后处理,以确保新鲜农产品的质量和安全。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号