...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Using a Prompt Sheet to Improve the Reference Interview in a Health Telephone Helpline Service
【24h】

Using a Prompt Sheet to Improve the Reference Interview in a Health Telephone Helpline Service

机译:使用提示表改善健康电话求助热线服务中的参考面试

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective - The study examined whether a prompt sheet improved the reference interview process for health information advisers working at NHS Direct, a 24 hour telephone helpline that provides confidential health care advice for the public in England. Method - A randomised control trial was conducted at eight NHS Direct sites across England in 2003-04. Newly recruited health information advisers (n=30), full and part-time, were randomly allocated to a control group (n=15) or intervention group (n=15), and 26 completed the study. Existing health information advisers were involved in the planning and design of the intervention. The prompt sheet included prompts for demographic information, reason for call, condition/treatment plan, existing knowledge of caller, special needs of the caller, handling a call empathetically, conclusion. Testing of reference interview expertise was done at the end of basic training, and two months later, using the same ten test questions, that were based on common questions received by NHS Direct. A relevance framework for possible responses was drawn up for each question for scoring test responses, with more relevant responses scoring higher than less relevant responses. Results - The average score of prompt (experimental) and non-prompt (control) participants increased on the second test, for each of the 10 questions. The prompt group improved significantly more overall than the control group. There was variation within the groups. Sixteen health information assistants showed a net increase in their score over all ten questions (10 experimental group, six control group). The post-test score for an individual on a particular question did sometimes decrease from the pre-test score, but all 26 improved on at least one question. Previous call handler experience did not appear to influence the extent of improvement, but length and type of experience in the post may have an influence. Conclusion - The trial demonstrated the benefit of a simple and inexpensive prompt sheet for some, though not all, newly recruited health information advisers to improve their reference interview technique.
机译:目的-该研究检查了提示表是否改善了NHS Direct工作的健康信息顾问的参考采访过程,该服务是24小时的电话热线,为英格兰的公众提供保密的医疗保健建议。方法-2003-04年在英格兰的8个NHS Direct站点进行了一项随机对照试验。新招募的全职和兼职的健康信息顾问(n = 30)被随机分配到对照组(n = 15)或干预组(n = 15),其中26位完成了研究。现有的健康信息顾问参与了干预措施的规划和设计。提示表包括有关人口统计信息,通话原因,病情/治疗计划,呼叫者的现有知识,呼叫者的特殊需求,善于处理呼叫,结论的提示。参考面试专业知识的测试是在基础培训结束时进行的,两个月后,使用相同的十个测试问题,这些问题是基于NHS Direct收到的常见问题进行的。为每个问题制定了一个可能的答案的相关性框架,以对测试答案进行评分,相关性更高的得分高于不相关性更高的得分。结果-在第二个测试中,针对10个问题中的每一个,提示(实验)和不提示(对照)的参与者的平均分数均增加了。提示组比对照组的总体改善显着。各组之间存在差异。在所有十个问题(十个实验组,六个对照组)中,十六名健康信息助手的得分净增长。某个问题上某个人的测验后分数有时确实比测验前分数有所下降,但是至少有一个问题,所有这26个分数都有所提高。先前的呼叫处理程序经验似乎并未影响改进的程度,但是职位的经验长度和类型可能会有所影响。结论-该试验表明,对于一些(尽管不是全部)新近招聘的健康信息顾问来说,简单而廉价的提示表的好处在于改善了他们的参考访谈技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号