...
首页> 外文期刊>Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics >Primary Ankle Arthrodesis vs ORIF for Severely Comminuted Pilon Fractures: A Comparative Retrospective Study
【24h】

Primary Ankle Arthrodesis vs ORIF for Severely Comminuted Pilon Fractures: A Comparative Retrospective Study

机译:严重粉碎性Pilon骨折的原发性踝关节置换术与ORIF:一项比较性回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The treatment for highly comminuted pilon fractures remains controversial. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to compare functional outcomes of primary arthrodesis of the tibiotalar joint (fusion) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).Methods:Patients who underwent primary ORIF or fusion for pilon fractures at our institution since 2000 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code. Inclusion criteria for the ORIF cohort were patients with an AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C3 pilon fracture. Additional inclusion criteria for the fusion cohort were patients whose fractures were deemed non-reconstructable by the treating surgeon. Outcome assessment was determined by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form 36-item health survey (SF-36), time to radiographic union or fusion, and wound-healing complications at a minimum of 2 years after their surgery.Results:Nineteen ORIF and 16 fusion patients completed the study’s outcome assessments. A high...
机译:背景:对于高度粉碎的皮隆骨折的治疗方法仍存在争议。这项回顾性队列研究的目的是比较胫距关节(融合)和切开复位内固定(ORIF)的原发性关节功能的方法。方法:确定自2000年以来在我院接受皮尔骨折原发性ORIF或融合的患者根据当前程序术语(CPT)代码。 ORIF队列的纳入标准为AO /骨科创伤协会C3型pilon骨折患者。融合队列的其他纳入标准是骨折的主治医生认为其不可修复的患者。结果评估由足踝结果评分(FAOS)和简短的36项健康状况调查(SF-36),影像学结合或融合时间以及术后至少2年的伤口愈合并发症来确定。结果:19名ORIF和16名融合患者完成了研究的结果评估。高...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号