...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >One-Shot Library Instruction Sessions May Not Increase Student Use of Academic Journals or Diversity of Sources
【24h】

One-Shot Library Instruction Sessions May Not Increase Student Use of Academic Journals or Diversity of Sources

机译:一站式图书馆教学会议可能不会增加学生对学术期刊的使用或来源的多样性

获取原文
           

摘要

A Review of: Howard, K., Nicholas, T., Hayes, T., & Appelt, C. W. (2014). Evaluating one-shot library sessions: Impact on the quality and diversity of student source use. Community & Junior College Libraries, 20(1-2), 27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763915.2014.1009749 Objective – To assess the effect of one-shot library research workshops focused on database searching on student coursework bibliographies. Design – Comparative bibliometric analysis of student bibliographies. Setting – Career and Transfer Program at a community college in Illinois, United States of America. Subjects – Students taking an English 101 course. Methods – During the study, 39 sections of English 101 occurred. An optional library instruction session was offered to faculty and as a result students from 18 sections participated. Each session consisted of a 45-minute lecture and 30 minutes of independent research time. The librarian delivering the session introduced students to keyword searching and demonstrated the online library catalogue and two core electronic databases; Academic Search Complete, and Opposing Viewpoints in Context (OVC), and other databases of their choosing. Students in each session were required to submit a variety of assignments in an exit portfolio at the end of the semester. Sections of students were excluded if the instructors did not submit the students’ portfolios and they no longer taught at the community college, making it impossible to track down the portfolios. Exclusion also occurred in cases where sections were taught by the researchers. Seventeen sections who had attended library instruction group and 14 sections who had not attended the library instruction group were included in the study and randomised. Researchers evaluated portfolios according to the following criteria: whether the student who submitted the portfolio attended library instruction; whether their portfolio earned a pass or fail mark; total number of citations in bibliographies; number of each type of source (e.g., book, journal, Internet resource, or other; and dates of sources). Main Results – Data were collected from 115 portfolios submitted by students who had attended a library session and 92 portfolios from students who had not attended a library session. Student pass or fail status was not reported. Attending library instruction did not have a significant effect on the mean number of total citations: 5.513 for attendees vs. 6.076 for non-attendees. Of 205 student portfolios evaluated, there was no difference in the number of types of resources used by students who had library instruction (2.3 ± 0.1) and those who had none (2.2 ± 0.1; p > 0.05). Conclusion – The library instruction sessions did not increase the use of academic journals or the diversity of sources used. However, students were more likely to use library sources if they attended training. The authors recommend that demonstrating multiple databases should be covered in later sessions and more conceptual information literacy instruction should be the first step. Librarians could teach the value of different types of sources; connect the sources to the tools needed to locate and access them; and demonstrate how to effectively evaluate sources. The authors recommend further research to evaluate objectives, content and outcomes of this type of library instruction.
机译:评论:霍华德,K。,尼古拉斯,T。,海斯,T。,和阿佩尔特,C.W。(2014)。评估一次性图书馆课程:对学生资源使用质量和多样性的影响。社区与初级学院图书馆,20(1-2),27-38。 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763915.2014.1009749目的–评估针对数据库搜索的单次图书馆研究讲习班对学生课程参考书目的影响。设计–学生书目的比较书目分析。美利坚合众国伊利诺伊州一所社区大学的“职业与转移计划”。科目–参加英语101课程的学生。方法–研究期间,英语101的39个部分出现了。向教师提供了可选的图书馆教学课程,因此,来自18个部门的学生参加了该课程。每节课由45分钟的讲座和30分钟的独立研究时间组成。主持会议的图书馆员向学生介绍了关键词搜索,并展示了在线图书馆目录和两个核心电子数据库。 “学术搜索完成”和“上下文中反对的观点(OVC)”以及他们选择的其他数据库。每学期的学生都必须在学期末的出口档案袋中提交各种作业。如果教师不提交学生的档案袋,并且他们不再在社区大学任教,则无法追踪学生的档案袋。在研究人员教节的情况下也发生排斥。纳入研究的17个科室和未参加该图书馆的科室14个科室被随机分为研究对象。研究人员根据以下标准评估档案袋:提交档案袋的学生是否参加过图书馆的教学;他们的投资组合是否获得及格或不及格分数;参考书目中的引用总数;每种来源的编号(例如,书籍,期刊,Internet资源或其他;以及来源的日期)。主要结果–数据来自参加图书馆课程的学生提交的115个档案袋和未参加图书馆课程的学生提供的92个档案袋。未报告学生通过或未通过状态。参加图书馆教学不会对平均总被引用数产生显着影响:参会者为5.513,未参会者为6.076。在评估的205个学生档案袋中,有图书馆指导的学生使用的资源类型数量(2.3±0.1)与没有图书馆指导的学生使用的资源类型数量没有差异(2.2±0.1; p> 0.05)。结论–图书馆教学会议并未增加学术期刊的使用或所使用来源的多样性。但是,如果参加培训,学生更有可能使用图书馆资源。作者建议在以后的会议中介绍演示多个数据库,并且第一步应该是更具概念性的信息素养指导。图书馆员可以传授不同类型资源的价值;将源连接到查找和访问所需的工具;并演示如何有效评估资源。作者建议进行进一步研究,以评估此类图书馆教学的目标,内容和结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号