首页> 外文期刊>Gynecology, obstetrics & reproductive medicine : >Comparison of Inflammatory Reactions Following Two Different Cesarean Section Techniques: The Modified Misgav-Ladach Versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr; A Prospective Randomized Trial
【24h】

Comparison of Inflammatory Reactions Following Two Different Cesarean Section Techniques: The Modified Misgav-Ladach Versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr; A Prospective Randomized Trial

机译:两种剖宫产术后炎症反应的比较:改良的Misgav-Ladach与Pfannenstiel-Kerr;前瞻性随机试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives: There is not yet a consensus on the optimal surgical technique for cesarean section. This is the first study comparing two different (Cesarean Section) with respect to the following inflammatory reaction in means of changes in inflammatory marker levels. To evaluate the differences in inflammatory reactions following two different (Cesarean Section) techniques, the modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique. Study Des?gn: The study population included 88 pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria. These women were randomized into two groups according to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines: Group 1 (Misgav-Ladach group) and Group 2 (Pfannenstiel Kerr group). To compare the inflammatory reactions following surgery, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) levels were measured in venous blood samples drawn from the patients just before (0 hour) and 24 hours (24th hour) after the surgery. In 5 women from Group 1 and 2 women from Group 2, the 24th hour blood samples could not be obtained or were lost. Thus, a total of 81 women, 39 women from Group 1 and 42 women from Group 2, comprised the population of study. The differences in inflammatory reactions between the 0 and 24th hours were analyzed by calculating the percent change in IL-6 and TNF-α levels, and these percentages were then compared between the groups. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding the serum IL-6 level change between 0 and 24th hour (530±653% and 196±168%, respectively, p=0.022. The difference in TNF-α was also higher in Group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (229±306% vs. 571±824%, p=0.12). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in Group 1 (9.44 min. vs. 16.86 min, p=0.0001). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the modified Misgav-Ladach technique has a weaker inflammatory reaction, which indicates fewer short- and long-term surgical complications.
机译:目的:关于剖宫产的最佳手术技术尚未达成共识。这是第一项研究,通过炎症标志物水平的变化,就随后的炎症反应比较了两种不同的方法(剖宫产术)。为了评估两种不同(剖宫产)技术(改良的Misgav-Ladach与Pfannenstiel-Kerr技术)在炎性反应方面的差异。研究目的:研究人群包括88名符合纳入标准的孕妇。根据《合并报告标准》指南,将这些妇女分为两组:第一组(Misgav-Ladach组)和第二组(Pfannenstiel Kerr组)。为了比较手术后的炎症反应,在从患者(0小时)和24小时(24小时)抽取的静脉血样本中测量了白细胞介素6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平)。在第1组的5名妇女和第2组的2名妇女中,第24小时的血液样本无法获得或丢失。因此,共有81位女性,1组39位女性和2组42位女性组成了研究人群。通过计算IL-6和TNF-α水平的变化百分比来分析0和24小时之间的炎症反应差异,然后比较两组之间的百分比。结果:第1组和第2组之间在0和24小时之间的血清IL-6水平变化有统计学差异(分别为530±653%和196±168%,p =0.022。TNF-α的差异)在第2组中也较高,但差异无统计学意义(229±306%对571±824%,p = 0.12);第1组的平均手术时间明显较短(9.44分钟对16.86分钟, p = 0.0001)。结论:这项研究的结果表明,改良的Misgav-Ladach技术的炎症反应较弱,这表明短期和长期手术并发症较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号