...
首页> 外文期刊>Energies >A Critical Review on Processes and Energy Profile of the Australian Meat Processing Industry
【24h】

A Critical Review on Processes and Energy Profile of the Australian Meat Processing Industry

机译:对澳大利亚肉类加工业的过程和能量特征的评论

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This review article addresses wastewater treatment methods in the red meat processing industry. The focus is on conventional chemicals currently in use for abattoir wastewater treatment and energy related aspects. In addition, this article discusses the use of cleaning and sanitizing agents at the meat processing facilities and their effect on decision making in regard to selecting the treatment methods. This study shows that cleaning chemicals are currently used at a concentration of 2% to 3% which will further be diluted with the bulk wastewater. For example, for an abattoir that produces 3500 m 3 /day wastewater and uses around 200 L (3%) acid and alkaline chemicals, the final concentration of these chemical will be around 0.00017%. For this reason, the effects of these chemicals on the treatment method and the environment are very limited. Chemical treatment is highly efficient in removing soluble and colloidal particles from the red meat processing industry wastewater. Actually, it is shown that, if chemical treatment has been applied, then biological treatment can only be included for the treatment of the solid waste by-product and/or for production of bioenergy. Chemical treatment is recommended in all cases and especially when the wastewater is required to be reused or released to water streams. This study also shows that energy consumption for chemical treatment units is insignificant while efficient compared to other physical or biological units. A combination of a main (ferric chloride) and an aid coagulant has shown to be efficient and cost-effective in treating abattoir wastewater. The cost of using this combination per cubic meter wastewater treated is 0.055 USD/m 3 compared to 0.11 USD/m 3 for alum and the amount of sludge produced is 77% less than that produced by alum. In addition, the residues of these chemicals in the wastewater and the sludge have a positive or no impact on biological processes. Energy consumption from a small wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) installed to recycle wastewater for a meet facility can be around $500,000.
机译:这篇评论文章介绍了红肉加工业中的废水处理方法。重点是目前用于屠场废水处理和能源相关方面的常规化学品。此外,本文讨论了在肉类加工设施中使用清洁和消毒剂以及它们在选择处理方法方面对决策的影响。这项研究表明,目前使用的清洁化学品浓度为2%至3%,将进一步用大量废水稀释。例如,对于每天产生3500 m 3废水并使用约200 L(3%)酸性和碱性化学品的屠宰场,这些化学品的最终浓度约为0.00017%。因此,这些化学品对处理方法和环境的影响非常有限。化学处理在从红肉加工业废水中去除可溶性和胶体颗粒方面非常有效。实际上,已经表明,如果已经进行了化学处理,则仅可以包括生物处理来处理固体废物副产物和/或用于生产生物能。建议在所有情况下都进行化学处理,尤其是在要求废水回用或释放到水流中时。这项研究还表明,与其他物理或生物单元相比,化学处理单元的能耗虽然微不足道,但效率很高。主要(氯化铁)和助凝剂的组合在处理屠宰场废水方面显示出了高效和成本效益。每处理一立方米废水使用这种组合的成本为0.055美元/立方米,而明矾为0.11美元/立方米,产生的污泥量比明矾减少77%。此外,废水和污泥中这些化学物质的残留物对生物过程有正面影响或没有影响。小型废水处理厂(WWTP)的能源消耗大约为500,000美元,废水处理厂用于将废水再循环至会议设施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号