首页> 外文期刊>Fisioterapia em Movimento >Esteira e cinesioterapia versus fisioterapia convencional na doen?a de Parkinson: estudo pragmáticoEntrenamiento en la cinta de correr y la cinesioterapia versus fisioterapia convencional en la enfermedad de Parkinson: estudio pragmático
【24h】

Esteira e cinesioterapia versus fisioterapia convencional na doen?a de Parkinson: estudo pragmáticoEntrenamiento en la cinta de correr y la cinesioterapia versus fisioterapia convencional en la enfermedad de Parkinson: estudio pragmático

机译:帕金森氏病的Steira和kinesiotherapy与传统物理疗法的对比:实用研究帕金森氏病的踏步训练和kinesiotherapy与常规物理疗法的对比:实用性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Physiotherapy has been identified in the literature as an important treatment for individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) to improve functional capacity. Little is discussed about the physiotherapy practice environment for this population. Objective: To assess pragmatically the effects of two physiotherapy protocols: Conventional Physiotherapy (CP) and Treadmill Training and Kinesiotherapy (TTK) in PD patients. Method: Twenty-four PD patients classified from 1 to 3 on the Hoehn and Yahr scale were randomly distributed into two groups. In CP group (12 patients), exercises aimed to improve range of motion, bradykinesia, postural adjustments and gait. In TTK group (12 patients), exercises aimed to improve physical fitness, mobility and functional independence. The treatments were performed for 50 minutes, twice a week for 14 weeks. The following evaluations were performed before and after the interventions: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS); gait speed (GS); up stairs (US) and down stairs (DS) tests; timed get-up-and-go test (TUG) and 6-Minute Walk Distance Test (6-MWDT). Sociodemographic and clinical data were presented as descriptive analysis. Variables with normal and non-normal distributions were analyzed by specific statistical tests. Results: Intragroup analysis showed significant results for the TTK group (TUG, US, DS, GS, UPDRS total and UPDRS II) and for the CP group only UPDRS total. Intergroup analysis was favorable for the TTK group (TUG, US, DS, 6-MWDT). Conclusion: CP group improved the patients’ general clinical status, while treadmill and kinesiotherapy improved the physical-functional and clinical aspects.
机译:简介:物理疗法在文献中已被确定为帕金森氏病(PD)个体提高功能能力的重要治疗方法。关于该人群的理疗实践环境的讨论很少。目的:实用地评估两种物理治疗方案对PD患者的影响:常规物理治疗(CP)和跑步机训练与运动疗法(TTK)。方法:将24例按Hoehn和Yahr量表从1分为3的PD患者随机分为两组。在CP组(12例患者)中,运动旨在改善运动范围,运动迟缓,姿势调整和步态。在TTK组(12例患者)中,锻炼旨在改善身体健康,活动能力和功能独立性。治疗进行了50分钟,每周两次,共14周。在干预前后进行了以下评估:帕金森病综合评分量表(UPDRS);步态速度(GS);上楼梯(美国)和下楼梯(DS)测试;定时起步测试(TUG)和6分钟步行距离测试(6-MWDT)。社会人口统计学和临床​​数据作为描述性分析。通过特定的统计检验分析了具有正态分布和非正态分布的变量。结果:组内分析显示TTK组(TUG,US,DS,GS,UPDRS总数和UPDRS II)有显着结果,而CP组只有UPDRS总数。组间分析对TTK组(TUG,US,DS,6-MWDT)有利。结论:CP组改善了患者的总体临床状况,而跑步机和运动疗法改善了患者的身体机能和临床方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号