首页> 外文期刊>Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment >Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Triptorelin versus Leuprolide in the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer:
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Triptorelin versus Leuprolide in the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer:

机译:雷公藤瑞林与亮丙瑞林治疗晚期前列腺癌的成本效果分析:

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of triptorelin versus leuprolide in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.MethodsBased on the results of a clinical study, we built a model in which two cohorts of patients received triptorelin (3.75 mg) or leuprolide (7.5 mg). The agents were injected intramuscularly every 28 days. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. We considered the efficacy of treatments (overall survival) and direct medical costs (pharmacological and administration costs, value year 2015). Sensitivity and threshold analyses on key clinical and economic parameters were performed.ResultsThe model results showed that triptorelin increased life expectancy compared to leuprolide (0.972 LYs vs. 0.925 LYs). Triptorelin showed the higher pharmacological treatment cost (€953.86 vs. €882.91). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for life-years gained of triptorelin were €1,506.87. Sensitivity analyses confirm...
机译:目的本研究的目的是评估曲普瑞林与亮丙瑞林治疗晚期前列腺癌的成本效益。方法基于临床研究的结果,我们建立了一个模型,其中两个队列的患者接受曲普瑞林(3.75 mg)或亮丙瑞林(7.5毫克)。每28天肌内注射药剂。分析是从意大利国家卫生局的角度进行的。我们考虑了治疗的有效性(总体生存)和直接医疗费用(药理和管理费用,价值2015年)。结果对模型和临床结果进行了敏感性和阈值分析。结果模型结果表明,曲普瑞林与亮丙瑞林相比寿命延长(0.972 LYs vs. 0.925 LYs)。 Triptorelin的药理治疗费用较高(€953.86比€882.91)。雷公藤甲素在生命年中获得的增量成本效益比为1,506.87欧元。敏感性分析证实...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号