首页> 外文期刊>Family medicine >The Social Mission in Medical School Mission Statements: Associations With Graduate Outcomes
【24h】

The Social Mission in Medical School Mission Statements: Associations With Graduate Outcomes

机译:医学院使命宣言中的社会使命:与毕业生成果相关联

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objectives: Mission statements of medical schools vary considerably. These statements reflect institutional values and may also be reflected in the outputs of their institutions. The authors explored the relationship between US medical school mission statement content and outcomes in terms of graduate location and specialty choices.Methods: A panel of stakeholders (medical school deans, faculty, medical students, and administrators) completed a Web-based instrument to create a linear scale of social mission content (SMC scale), scoring the degree to which medical school mission statements reflect the social mission of medical education to address inequities. The SMC scale and targeted medical school outputs were analyzed via OLS regression, controlling for allopathic/osteopathic and public/private school designation. The medical school outputs of interest included percent physician output in primary care specialties (family medicine, pediatrics, and general internal medicine), as well as percent physician output in designated Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSA) and Medically Underserved Areas/Populations (MUA/P).Results: SMC scale was a statistically significant, positive predictor of the percent of physician graduates entering primary care (β=2.526, P=.001). When examining the specialties within primary care, the SMC scale only significantly predicted percent of graduating physicians entering family medicine (β=1.936, P=.003). SMC scale was also a statistically significant predictor of several measures of physician output to work in underserved areas and populations, the strongest of which was the percent of graduating physicians working in MUA/Ps (β=4.256, P≤.01).Conclusions: Mission statements that are diligently utilized by leaders in medical education may produce a higher degree of alignment between institutional structure, ideology, and workforce outcomes.(Fam Med 2015;47(6):427-34.)Graduation from an accredited medical school is a requirement for entry into the medical profession in the United States, and US allopathic and osteopathic institutions are responsible for the education of the vast majority of physicians that care for the health of the US population. The unique position of these medical schools as the gateway to the medical profession, paired with their considerable public financing, demands an accountability among these institutions to be responsive to the health needs of the population.1,2 Many have recently made the case that medical schools should be more socially accountable for the production of physicians who will improve health care access and equity through a focus on primary care and service to underserved areas and populations, such as rural or low-income communities.3-7US allopathic (MD-granting) medical schools have been expanding rapidly over the last decade, since the 2005 Council on Graduate Medical Education (COGME) 16th Report heralding a shortfall in the nation’s physician supply.8 Osteopathic (DO-granting) institutions’ outputs, meanwhile, have nearly tripled since 1995.9 Absent a funded national body to coordinate workforce expansion, however, the association between medical school expansion and population need has, meanwhile, been limited.10 Health insurance expansion provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 have suggested that a heavy emphasis on primary care workforce expansion is required, as primary care physicians serve as the point of entry to the health care system for many individuals.11,12 However, this increased emphasis on access to primary care is mismatched with the current workforce supply. Only 30% of US physicians practice in primary care, a proportion that falls short of the 40% recommended by the COGME 20th Report advising the US Congress on the minimum proportion required to provide appropriate care to the nation’s diverse, aging and chronically ill population.11,13,14 Only 8.4% of US medical school graduates from June 2
机译:背景和目标:医学院的使命陈述相差很大。这些陈述反映了机构的价值观,也可能反映在其机构的产出中。作者从毕业生的位置和专业选择的角度探讨了美国医学院使命宣言内容与结果之间的关系。方法:利益相关者小组(医学院院长,教职员工,医学院学生和管理人员)完成了一个基于Web的工具来创建社会任务内容的线性量表(SMC量表),对医学院的任务陈述反映医学教育应对不平等的社会任务的程度进行评分。通过OLS回归分析SMC规模和目标医学院的产出,控制同种疗法/整骨疗法和公立/私立学校的名称。感兴趣的医学院产出包括在初级保健专业(家庭医学,儿科和普通内科医学)中的医师产出百分比,以及在指定的卫生专业人员短缺地区(HPSA)和医疗服务不足地区/人口(MUA /结果:SMC量表是进入初级保健的医师毕业生百分比的统计显着阳性指标(β= 2.526,P = .001)。在检查初级保健的专业时,SMC量表仅显着预测了即将进入家庭医学的应届医师百分比(β= 1.936,P = .003)。 SMC量表也是在服务欠佳地区和人口中工作的医生人数的几种度量的统计显着预测指标,其中最强的是在MUA / P中工作的应届毕业生的百分比(β= 4.256,P≤.01)。领导者在医学教育中勤奋地运用的使命宣言可能会在机构结构,意识形态和员工成果之间产生更高的一致性。(Fam Med 2015; 47(6):427-34。)在美国进入医学专业的要求,而美国的同种疗法和整骨疗法机构负责对绝大多数关心美国人口健康的医师进行教育。这些医学院校作为通往医学专业的门户的独特地位,加上其可观的公共资金,要求这些机构承担起责任,以响应人口的健康需求。1,2最近,许多人提出了医学的理由学校应该对医生的生产负起更多的社会责任,他们将通过专注于为医疗服务不足的地区和人口(如农村或低收入社区)提供初级保健和服务,从而改善医疗服务的获取和公平性。3-7 )自2005年研究生医学教育委员会(COGME)第16次报告预示了美国医生供应的短缺以来,医学院的规模一直在迅速增长。8同时,整骨疗法(赠与DO的机构)的产出几乎翻了三倍自1995.9以来,缺少一个负责协调劳动力扩张的国家机构,但是,医学院校扩张与人口需求之间的联系同时,它也受到了限制。10《 2010年患者保护和负担得起的医疗法案》中有关健康保险扩展的规定表明,由于初级保健医生是进入医疗保健的切入点,因此需要重点强调扩大初级保健劳动力11,12然而,这种对获得初级保健的日益重视与目前的劳动力供应不匹配。美国只有30%的医生从事初级保健服务,这一比例低于《 COGME第20次报告》建议的40%,该报告向美国国会建议了为美国多样化,老龄化和慢性病人群提供适当护理所需的最低比例。 11,13,14从6月2日开始,美国医学院毕业生中只有8.4%

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号