...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Health Action >Local perceptions of causes of death in rural South Africa: a comparison of perceived and verbal autopsy causes of death
【24h】

Local perceptions of causes of death in rural South Africa: a comparison of perceived and verbal autopsy causes of death

机译:南非农村地区对死亡原因的本地认识:感知和口头尸检死因的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Understanding how lay people perceive the causes of mortality and their associated risk factors is important for public health. In resource-limited settings, where verbal autopsy (VA) is used as the most expedient method of determining cause of death, it is important to understand how pre-existing concepts of cause of death among VA-informants may influence their VA-responses and the consequential impact on cause of death assessment. This study describes the agreement between VA-derived causes of death and informant-perceived causes and associated influential factors, which also reflects lay health literacy in this setting.Method: Using 20 years of VA data (n=11,228) from the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) site in rural South Africa, we explored the agreement between the causes of death perceived by the VA-informants and those assigned by the automated Inter-VA tool. Kappa statistics and concordance correlation coefficients were applied to measure agreement at individual and population levels, respectively. Multivariable regression models were used to explore factors associated with recognised lay perceptions of causes of mortality.Results: Agreement between informant-perceived and VA-derived causes of death at the individual level was limited, but varied substantially by cause of death. However, agreement at the population level, comparing cause-specific mortality fractions was higher, with the notable exception of bewitchment as a cause. More recent deaths, those in adults aged 15–49 years, deaths outside the home, and those associated with external causes showed higher concordance with InterVA.Conclusion: Overall, informant perception of causes of death was limited, but depended on informant characteristics and causes of death, and to some extent involved non-biomedical constructs. Understanding discordance between perceived and recognised causes of death is important for public health planning; low community understanding of causes of death may be detrimental to public health. These findings also illustrate the importance of using rigorous and standardised VA methods rather than relying on informants’ reported causes of death.
机译:背景:了解外行人如何看待死亡原因及其相关的危险因素对于公共卫生非常重要。在资源有限的环境中,使用口头尸检(VA)作为确定死亡原因的最方便方法,重要的是要了解VA信息提供者中先前存在的死亡原因概念如何影响他们的VA反应和对死亡原因评估的后果。这项研究描述了VA导致的死亡原因与知情者认为的原因及相关影响因素之间的一致性,这也反映了这种情况下的非专业健康素养。方法:使用来自Agincourt Health和在南非农村的人口监视系统(HDSS)站点中,我们探索了VA信息人感知的死亡原因与自动Inter-VA工具分配的死亡原因之间的一致性。分别使用Kappa统计量和一致性相关系数来衡量个人和总体水平的一致性。结果:在个人水平上知情者和VA衍生死亡原因之间的一致性受到限制,但因死亡原因而有很大差异。但是,在人群一级,比较因特定原因而导致的死亡率的比例更高,但引人注意的原因除外。最近的死亡,15-49岁的成年人死亡,屋外死亡以及与外部原因相关的死亡与InterVA的一致性更高。结论:总的来说,知情者对死亡原因的认识有限,但取决于知情者的特征和原因死亡,并在某种程度上涉及非生物医学构造。了解死亡原因与公认死亡原因之间的矛盾对于公共卫生规划很重要;社区对死亡原因的了解不足可能会损害公共卫生。这些发现还说明了使用严格的标准化VA方法而不是依靠举报人的死亡原因的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号