...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Journal of Health Science >Health Research and Millennium Development Goals: Identifying the Gap From Public Health Perspective
【24h】

Health Research and Millennium Development Goals: Identifying the Gap From Public Health Perspective

机译:卫生研究与千年发展目标:从公共卫生角度确定差距

获取原文
           

摘要

Assessing the research output within the universities could provide an effective means for tracking the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) progress. This analytical database study was designed to assess the trend of research theses conducted by the Public Health Department (PHD), Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University during the period 1990 to 2014 as related to the: MDGS, Faculty and department research priority plans and to identify the discrepancies between researchers’ priorities versus national and international research priorities. A manual search of the theses was done at the Postgraduate Library using a specially designed checklist to chart adherence of each thesis to: MDGs, Faculty and department research plans (RPs). The theses’ profile showed that the highest research output was for addressing the MDGS followed by the PHD and Faculty RPs. Compliance to MDGs 5 and 6 was obvious, whereas; MDGs 2, 3, and 7 were not represented at all after year 2000. No significant difference was found between PH theses addressing the Faculty RPs and those which were not before and after 2010. A significantly lower percent of PH theses was fulfilling the PHD research priorities compared to those which were not after 2010. This study showed a definite decline in research output tackling the MDGS and PHD research priorities, with a non-significant increase in the production of theses addressing the Faculty RPs. The present study is a practical model for policy makers within the universities to develop and implement a reliable monitoring and evaluation system for assessment of research output.
机译:对大学内部的研究成果进行评估可以为跟踪千年发展目标的进展提供有效的手段。此分析数据库研究旨在评估由开罗大学医学院公共卫生系(PHD)在1990年至2014年期间进行的研究趋势,这些趋势与以下各项有关:MDGS,教职员工和研究部门优先计划以及确定研究人员优先级与国家和国际研究优先级之间的差异。在研究生图书馆使用特殊设计的清单对论文进行了手动搜索,以绘制每个论文对以下各项的遵循情况:MDG,教职员工和系研究计划(RP)。这些论文的概况表明,最高的研究成果是针对MDGS的,其次是PHD和Faculty RP。显然符合千年发展目标5和6。 MDGs 2、3和7在2000年以后完全没有代表。针对教职人员RP的PH论文与未于2010年前和之后的PH论文之间没有发现显着差异。PH论文中要完成PHD研究的比例要低得多优先事项与2010年之后的优先事项进行比较。该研究表明,针对MDGS和PHD研究重点的研究成果明显下降,而针对教职人员RP的论文产量却没有显着增加。本研究是大学内部决策者开发和实施可靠的监测和评估系统以评估研究成果的实用模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号