...
首页> 外文期刊>Geospatial Health >A comparison of temporal and location-based sampling strategies for global positioning system-triggered electronic diaries
【24h】

A comparison of temporal and location-based sampling strategies for global positioning system-triggered electronic diaries

机译:全球定位系统触发的电子日记基于时间和基于位置的采样策略的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Self-reporting is a well-established approach within the medical and psychological sciences. In order to avoid recall bias, i.e. past events being remembered inaccurately, the reports can be filled out on a smartphone in real-time and in the natural environment. This is often referred to as ambulatory assessment and the reports are usually triggered at regular time intervals. With this sampling scheme, however, rare events ( e.g. a visit to a park or recreation area) are likely to be missed. When addressing the correlation between mood and the environment, it may therefore be beneficial to include participant locations within the ambulatory assessment sampling scheme. Based on the geographical coordinates, the database query system then decides if a self-report should be triggered or not. We simulated four different ambulatory assessment sampling schemes based on movement data (coordinates by minute) from 143 voluntary participants tracked for seven consecutive days. Two location-based sampling schemes incorporating the environmental characteristics (land use and population density) at each participant’s location were introduced and compared to a time-based sampling scheme triggering a report on the hour as well as to a sampling scheme incorporating physical activity. We show that location-based sampling schemes trigger a report less often, but we obtain more unique trigger positions and a greater spatial spread in comparison to sampling strategies based on time and distance. Additionally, the location-based methods trigger significantly more often at rarely visited types of land use and less often outside the study region where no underlying environmental data are available.
机译:自我报告是医学和心理学领域公认的方法。为了避免召回偏差,即过去的事件被不正确地记住,可以在智能手机上实时和自然环境中填写报告。这通常被称为动态评估,并且报告通常以固定的时间间隔触发。但是,采用这种采样方案,很可能会错过罕见事件(例如,参观公园或休闲区)。当解决情绪与环境之间的相关性时,因此将参与者位置包括在动态评估采样方案中可能会有所帮助。然后,基于地理坐标,数据库查询系统将确定是否应触发自我报告。我们基于连续7天跟踪的143名自愿参与者的运动数据(分钟坐标),模拟了四种不同的门诊评估采样方案。引入了两个结合每个参与者所在位置的环境特征(土地利用和人口密度)的基于位置的采样方案,并将其与基于时间的采样方案(触发小时报告)以及与包含身体活动的采样方案进行了比较。我们显示,基于位置的采样方案触发报告的频率降低,但是与基于时间和距离的采样策略相比,我们获得了更多独特的触发位置和更大的空间分布。此外,基于位置的方法会在很少访问的土地使用类型上触发更多的频率,而在没有基础环境数据可用的研究区域之外触发频率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号