...
首页> 外文期刊>Geomatics,Natural Hazards & Risk >Volcanic ash cloud detection from space: a comparison between the RST ASH technique and the water vapour corrected BTD procedure
【24h】

Volcanic ash cloud detection from space: a comparison between the RST ASH technique and the water vapour corrected BTD procedure

机译:太空中火山灰云的探测:RST ASH技术与水蒸气校正BTD程序的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Volcanic eruptions can inject large amounts (Tg) of gas and particles into the troposphere and, sometimes, into the stratosphere. Besides the main gases (H 2 O, CO 2 , SO 2 and HCl), volcanic clouds contain a mix of silicate ash particles in the size range from 0.1 ????m to 1????mm or larger. The interest in volcanic ash detection is high, particularly because it represents a serious hazard for air traffic. Particles with dimensions of several millimetres can damage the aircraft structure (windows, wings, ailerons), while particles less than 10 ????m may be extremely dangerous for the jet engines and are undetectable by the pilots during night or in low visibility conditions. Furthermore, ash detection represents a critical step towards quantitative retrievals of plume parameters. In this paper two different satellite techniques for volcanic cloud detection and tracking are compared, namely a water vapour corrected version of the brightness temperature difference (BTD-WVC) procedure and an implementation of the robust satellite technique, specifically configured for volcanic ash (RST ASH ). The BTD method identifies volcanic ash clouds on the basis of the brightness temperature difference measured in two infrared spectral bands at around 11 and 12 ????m. To account for the atmospheric water vapour differential absorption in the 11?¢????12 ????m spectral range, which tends to reduce (and in some cases completely mask) the BTD signal, a water vapour correction procedure has been developed (BTD-WVC), based on measured or synthetic atmospheric profiles. RST ASH instead, is based on the analysis of a time series of satellite records, aimed at identifying signal anomalies through an automatic unsupervised change detection step. To assess the performance of the BTD-WVC and RST ASH methods in detecting volcanic ash clouds, some eruptive events of Mt Etna, observed by the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensor, have been analysed. The obtained results show a good agreement between the BTD-WVC and RST ASH techniques for all the considered images, in terms of pixels detected as ?¢????ash affected?¢???? (i.e. the ash cloud area). In particular, compared to the traditional BTD procedure, the BTD-WVC and RST ASH techniques significantly improve volcanic ash cloud detection, both in daytime and night-time data, especially in the case of low ash loading.
机译:火山喷发会将大量的气体和颗粒注入对流层,有时还会注入平流层。除主要气体(H 2 O,CO 2,SO 2和HCl)外,火山云还包含大小为0.1?m至1 ???? mm或更大的硅酸盐粉尘混合物。对火山灰检测的兴趣很高,特别是因为它对空中交通构成严重危害。几毫米大小的微粒可能会损坏飞机的结构(窗户,机翼,副翼),而小于10 µm的微粒对喷气发动机可能是极其危险的,飞行员在夜间或低能见度条件下无法察觉。此外,灰分检测代表了定量检索羽状参数的关键步骤。在本文中,比较了两种用于火山云检测和跟踪的不同卫星技术,即水蒸气校正版本的亮温差(BTD-WVC)过程和针对卫星云灰(RST ASH)专门配置的健壮卫星技术的实现)。 BTD方法根据在11和12μm左右的两个红外光谱带中测得的亮度温度差来识别火山灰云。为了说明在11≤θ≤12≤m光谱范围内的大气水蒸气差吸收,这往往会减小(在某些情况下会完全掩盖)BTD信号,已经采取了水蒸气校正程序。 (BTD-WVC)根据测量的或合成的大气剖面进行了开发。相反,RST ASH是基于对卫星记录的时间序列的分析,旨在通过自动无监督的变化检测步骤来识别信号异常。为了评估BTD-WVC和RST ASH方法在检测火山灰云中的性能,已经分析了由超高分辨率高分辨率辐射计(AVHRR)传感器观测到的埃特纳火山喷发事件。所获得的结果表明,对于所有考虑的图像,BTD-WVC和RST ASH技术之间的一致性很好,就检测到的像素而言,“受灰尘影响”。 (即灰云区域)。特别是,与传统的BTD程序相比,BTD-WVC和RST ASH技术在白天和晚上的数据中都显着改善了火山灰云的检测,尤其是在低灰分负荷的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号