...
首页> 外文期刊>Gaceta Sanitaria >Understanding Urban Health Inequalities: Methods and Design of the Heart Health Hoods Qualitative Project
【24h】

Understanding Urban Health Inequalities: Methods and Design of the Heart Health Hoods Qualitative Project

机译:了解城市卫生不平等:心脏健康罩定性项目的方法和设计

获取原文

摘要

ObjectiveQualitative methods may help to understand features related to health urban inequalities as a way to include citizens’ perceptions of their neighbourhoods in relation to their health-related behaviours. The aim of this article is to describe the methods and design of a qualitative urban health study.MethodsThe Heart Healthy Hoods (HHH) analyses cardiovascular health in an urban environment using mixed methods: electronic health records, quantitative individual questionnaires, physical examination, semi-structured Interviews (SSIs), focus groups (FGs) and participatory technics such as photovoice. This article focuses on the HHH qualitative methods and design. A case study was used to select three neighbourhoods in Madrid with different socioeconomic levels: low, medium, and high. The selection process for these three neighbourhoods was as follows: classification of all Madrid's neighbourhoods (128) according to their socioeconomic level; after ranking this classification, nine neighbourhoods, three by socioeconomic level, were short-listed; different urban sociology criteria and non-participant observation were used for the final selection of three neighbourhoods. After selecting the three neighbourhoods, thirty SSIs were held with residents and six SSIs were held with key informants. Finally, twenty-nine FGs will be conducted over the course of 8 months, between May and December of 2018.ConclusionsSystematization in the selection of neighbourhoods and the use of adequate techniques are essential for the qualitative study of urban health inequalities.
机译:客观的定性方法可能有助于理解与城市健康不平等相关的特征,以此作为一种方法,将公民对邻里的看法与健康相关的行为联系起来。本文的目的是描述定性城市健康研究的方法和设计。方法心脏健康罩(HHH)使用多种方法分析城市环境中的心血管健康:电子健康记录,定量个人问卷调查,身体检查,半结构化面试(SSI),焦点小组(FG)和参与式技术(例如,voicevoice)。本文重点介绍HHH定性方法和设计。通过案例研究选择了马德里不同社会经济水平的三个社区:低,中和高。这三个街区的选择过程如下:根据马德里的所有街区(128)的社会经济水平进行分类;在对这一分类进行排名之后,有9个社区入围了,按社会经济水平划分了3个。不同的城市社会学标准和非参与观察被用于三个社区的最终选择。在选择了三个街区之后,与居民一起举行了30个SSI,与关键线人一起举行了6个SSI。最后,将在2018年5月至12月的8个月中进行29个FGs。结论结论进行社区选择的系统化和使用适当的技术对于城市健康不平等的定性研究至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号