首页> 外文期刊>GaBi journal. >Tyrosine kinase inhibitors becoming generic drugs – risks and chances from a regulatory perspective
【24h】

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors becoming generic drugs – risks and chances from a regulatory perspective

机译:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂成为非专利药–从监管角度看的风险和机遇

获取原文
           

摘要

Author byline as per print journal:?Niels Eckstein, PhD;?Lea R?per, BSc;?Bodo Haas, PhD;?Henrike Potthast, PhD;?Ulrike Hermes, PhD;?Christoph Unkrig, MD;?Frauke Naumann-Winter, PhD;?Harald Enzmann, MDAim: To provide a systematic overview on: i) safety profiles; ii) pharmacokinetic parameters; and iii) regulatory framework of anti-cancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI).Methodology: Recherché of pharmakokinetic (PK)-parameter: i) Germany’s federal drug database (public domain part) was accessed in November 2013. Section 5.2 (PK) of Summary of Product Characteristics systematically was searched for available PK-parameters, and ii) A search in PubMed/Medline was performed also in November 2013 using the international non-proprietary name of the respective medicinal product combined with the term ‘early phase’ or ‘dose escalation’. PubMed recherché was restricted by searching only in clinical trials.Safety profile assessment: On 11 November 2013, Summary of Product Characteristics of currently marketed medicinal products was accessed. Side effects were categorized as mentioned in the table’s legend by frequency for each preferred term of the systems organ class system. Source: Summary of Product Characteristics published on the Heads of Medicines Agencies homepage: http://mri.medagencies.org/HumanResults: PK-parameters and safety profiles are presented in the respective tables. Throughout the text, clinical meaning, orphan drug status and current discussion on narrow therapeutic index (NTID)-status by European committees and working parties is discussed.Conclusion: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are a valuable addition of the therapeutic armamentarium. Especially in certain haematologic diseases, i.e. chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)-therapy, TKI have revolutionized pharmacotherapy with survival rates not significantly different from healthy matched population. However, as their safety profile differs substantially from conventional cytostatic drugs, new side effects impact on patient’s quality of life. About ten years after first substances were authorized, patent protection will end within the next years. Thus, product specific guidance is needed to accurately perform bioequivalence studies and file marketing authorization applications for registration of TKI-generics.Submitted: 7 February 2014; Revised: 13 March 2014; Accepted: 13 March 2014; Published online first: 26 March 2014IntroductionInitially, great expectations were associated with these drugs; some were met, others not. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a very worthy additional option for physicians in clinical management of certain types and lines of treatment of cancer, see Table 1 for a tabular overview. In haemato-oncology, they are contributing to the tendency of chronificating rather than curing the disease. In contrast, the expectation of a new era of cancer-therapy without or at least substantially less side effects were not fulfilled, TKI have numerous, partly severe side effects eventually entailed with fatal outcome, see Table 2. On the other hand, after evolving of resistance to conventional (cytotoxic) or targeted anti-cancer therapy, TKI serve as additional therapy options in second, third and/or fourth-line therapy regimes according to their approved indications. For instance, Sunitinib is approved after Imatinib resistance formation in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), and Lapatinib after non-responding to antracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy in combination with Trastuzumab in HER-2 positive breast cancer. Taken together, TKI are a valuable extension of the cancer drug armamentarium [1, 2].Challenges of generic TKI drugs in cancer therapyAccording to their European birth date during the past decade, these substances successively will be running off-patent within the next years, see Table 1. From a regulatory point of view, this raises the question how marketing authorization applications (MAA) should be filed and especially, how therapeutic
机译:由印刷期刊按行作者:Niels Eckstein博士; Lea Rper BSc; Bodo Haas博士; Henrike Potthast博士; Ulrike Hermes博士; Christoph Unkrig博士; Frauke Naumann-Winter ;博士; Harald Enzmann,MDAim:提供有关以下方面的系统概述:i)安全性; ii)药代动力学参数;方法学:药代动力学(PK)参数的Recherché:i)2013年11月访问了德国联邦药品数据库(公共领域部分)。第5.2节(PK)系统地搜索了产品特征摘要以查找可用的PK参数,并且ii)还在2013年11月对PubMed / Medline进行了搜索,使用了相应药品的国际非专有名称以及术语“早期”或“剂量升级”。仅在临床试验中进行检索限制了PubMedrecherché。安全性评估:2013年11月11日,访问了当前市售药品的产品特征摘要。如表中的说明中所述,将副作用分类为系统器官类系统中每个首选术语的出现频率。资料来源:发表在药品管理局负责人主页上的“产品特性摘要”:http://mri.medagencies.org/HumanResults:PK参数和安全性概况在各自的表格中列出。在全文中,讨论了临床意义,孤儿药物的状态以及欧洲委员会和工作组当前对狭窄治疗指数(NTID)状态的讨论。结论:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂是治疗性武器库的宝贵补充。尤其是在某些血液系统疾病(即慢性粒细胞白血病(CML))治疗中,TKI彻底改变了药物治疗方法,其存活率与健康人群没有明显差异。但是,由于它们的安全性与传统的细胞抑制药物大不相同,因此新的副作用会影响患者的生活质量。在第一种物质获得授权大约十年后,专利保护将在未来几年内终止。因此,需要有针对性的产品指南,以准确地进行生物等效性研究并申请上市许可以注册TKI仿制药。提交日期:2014年2月7日;修订日期:2014年3月13日;接受:2014年3月13日;首次在线发布:2014年3月26日简介最初,人们对这些药物抱有很高的期望。有些遇到了,有些没有。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)是医师在某些类型和类别的癌症治疗的临床管理中非常有价值的附加选择,有关表格概述,请参见表1。在血液肿瘤学中,它们助长了慢性化而不是治愈疾病的趋势。相反,没有实现没有或至少基本上没有副作用的癌症治疗新时代的期望,TKI具有许多部分致命的副作用,最终导致致命的后果,请参见表2。另一方面,在发展之后对于传统的(细胞毒性)或靶向抗癌治疗有抗药性,根据其批准的适应症,TKI在第二,第三和/或第四线治疗方案中可作为其他治疗选择。例如,舒尼替尼在伊马替尼在胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)中形成耐药性后得到批准,拉帕替尼在对基于环环素或紫杉烷类的化疗联合曲妥珠单抗治疗HER-2阳性乳腺癌无反应后得到批准。总而言之,TKI是抗癌药库的重要扩展[1,2]。普通TKI药物在癌症治疗中的挑战根据其在过去十年中在欧洲的出生日期,这些物质将在未来几年内逐渐失去专利保护。 ,请参阅表1。从监管角度来看,这提出了一个问题,即应如何提交市场授权申请(MAA),尤其是如何治疗

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号