首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material
【24h】

Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material

机译:比较道地中药材与非道地中药材的循证研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background. Daodi medicinal material is widely used in Chinese herb medication. However, there is a lack of systematic methodology for identifying characteristics associated with good quality and reliable efficacy of Daodi med-material. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to provide some evidence to further substantiate the use of Daodi medicinal materials. Methods. Seven relevant databases were searched before July 2014. Two evaluators were responsible for screening and categorizing the results. The data was analyzed with Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS 21.0 statistical software. Results. Overall, 107 articles were systematically analyzed. Of these studies, 55.1% (59/107) focused on the methodology to assess Daodi med-material, and 38.3% (41/107) were interested in med-material ingredients, soil physical and chemical properties, and the geological background system (GBS). Only 6.5% (7/107) of studies were mainly conducted as clinical trials and animal experiments. Conclusion. Comparisons between Daodi and non-Daodi materials have been studied mainly in terms of the ingredients or composition of medical materials, soil physics and chemistry, and the GBS, and some identifying methodologies have been created to identify Daodi attributes. Until now, there is still no consensus of comparison criteria between Daodi and non-Daodi medicinal material. Only a few studies were conducted through animal experiments and clinical trials to determine Daodi superiority.
机译:背景。道地药材广泛应用于中草药。然而,缺乏系统的方法来鉴定与道地中药材的高质量和可靠功效相关的特征。目的。这项研究的目的是提供一些证据,以进一步证实道帝药材的使用。方法。在2014年7月之前,搜索了七个相关的数据库。两名评估人员负责对结果进行筛选和分类。使用Microsoft Excel 2007和SPSS 21.0统计软件分析数据。结果。系统地分析了107篇文章。在这些研究中,有55.1%(59/107)专注于评估道地中药材的方法,而38.3%(41/107)对中药材成分,土壤理化性质和地质背景系统感兴趣( GBS)。只有6.5%(7/107)的研究主要通过临床试验和动物实验进行。结论。主要针对医疗材料的成分或组成,土壤物理和化学以及GBS,研究了道地材料与非道地材料之间的比较,并创建了一些标识方法来标识道地属性。迄今为止,道地药材和非道地药材的比较标准尚无共识。通过动物实验和临床试验仅进行了很少的研究以确定道迪的优越性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号