首页> 外文期刊>European Radiology Experimental >In vitro labelling and detection of mesenchymal stromal cells: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging of iron-labelled cells and magnetic resonance spectroscopy of fluorine-labelled cells
【24h】

In vitro labelling and detection of mesenchymal stromal cells: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging of iron-labelled cells and magnetic resonance spectroscopy of fluorine-labelled cells

机译:间充质基质细胞的体外标记和检测:铁标记细胞的磁共振成像与氟标记细胞的磁共振波谱之间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundAmong the various stem cell populations used for cell therapy, adult mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a major new cell technology. These cells must be tracked after transplantation to monitor their migration within the body and quantify their accumulation at the target site. This study assessed whether rat bone marrow MSCs can be labelled with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles and perfluorocarbon (PFC) nanoemulsion formulations without altering cell viability and compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) results from iron-labelled and fluorine-labelled MSCs, respectively. MethodsOf MSCs, 2?×?106 were labelled with Molday ION Rhodamine-B (MIRB) and 2?×?106 were labelled with Cell Sense. Cell viability was evaluated by trypan blue exclusion method. Labelled MSCs were divided into four samples containing increasing cell numbers (0.125?×?106, 0.25?×?106, 0.5?×?106, 1?×?106) and scanned on a 7T MRI: for MIRB-labelled cells, phantoms and cells negative control, T1, T2 and T2* maps were acquired; for Cell Sense labelled cells, phantoms and unlabelled cells, a 19F non-localised single-pulse MRS sequence was acquired. ResultsIn total, 86.8% and 83.6% of MIRB-labelled cells and Cell Sense-labelled cells were viable, respectively. MIRB-labelled cells were visible in all samples with different cell numbers; pellets containing 0.5?×?106 and 1?×?106 of Cell Sense-labelled cells showed a detectable 19F signal. ConclusionsOur data support the use of both types of contrast material (SPIO and PFC) for MSCs labelling, although further efforts should be dedicated to improve the efficiency of PFC labelling.
机译:背景技术在用于细胞治疗的各种干细胞群体中,成年间充质基质细胞(MSCs)已经成为一种主要的新细胞技术。移植后必须跟踪这些细胞,以监测其在体内的迁移并量化其在靶位点的积累。这项研究评估了大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞是否可以用超顺磁性氧化铁(SPIO)纳米颗粒和全氟化碳(PFC)纳米乳剂制剂标记而不改变细胞活力,并且比较了铁标记的磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振波谱(MRS)结果和分别用氟标记的MSC。方法在MSCs中,将2?×?10 6 标记为Molday ION Rhodamine-B(MIRB),将2?×?10 6 标记为Cell Sense。通过锥虫蓝排除法评价细胞活力。标记的MSC分为四个样本,每个样本的细胞数不断增加(0.125?×?10 6 ,0.25?×?10 6 ,0.5?×?10 6 < / sup>,1?×?10 6 )并在7T MRI上进行扫描:对于MIRB标记的细胞,体模和细胞阴性对照,获得了T1,T2和T2 *图。对于Cell Sense标记的细胞,体模和未标记的细胞,获得了 19 F非定位单脉冲MRS序列。结果总共有86.8%和83.6%的MIRB标记的细胞和Cell Sense标记的细胞存活。 MIRB标记的细胞在所有具有不同细胞编号的样品中可见;含有0.5?×?10 6 和1?×?10 6 的Cell Sense标记细胞的沉淀显示可检测到的 19 F信号。结论我们的数据支持将两种类型的造影剂(SPIO和PFC)用于MSCs标记,尽管应进一步努力提高PFC标记的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号