首页> 外文期刊>Evolutionary Psychology >Sex Differences in Same-Sex Direct Aggression and Sociosexuality: The Role of Risky Impulsivity:
【24h】

Sex Differences in Same-Sex Direct Aggression and Sociosexuality: The Role of Risky Impulsivity:

机译:同性直接攻击和社会性别中的性别差异:风险冲动的作用:

获取原文
       

摘要

Sex differences in same-sex direct aggression and sociosexuality are among the most robust in the literature. The present article evaluated the hypothesis that both can be explained by a sex difference in the willingness to take impulsive risks. Self-report data were gathered from 3,775 respondents (1,514 female) on same-sex aggression, sociosexuality, and risky impulsivity. Risky impulsivity was higher for men than for women (d = .34) and path analysis showed it to be a common cause of same-sex aggression and sociosexuality for both sexes. However, it did not completely mediate the sex differences in same-sex aggression and sociosexuality. The results suggest that same-sex aggression and sociosexual behavior share a common psychological mechanism, but that fully explaining sex differences in aggression requires a more sensitive assay of impulsive risk and a consideration of dyadic processes.
机译:同性直接攻击和社会性行为中的性别差异在文献中最为明显。本文对以下假设进行了评估:两种假设都可以通过在冲动风险意愿方面的性别差异来解释。自我报告数据来自3,775名受访者(1,514名女性),涉及同性侵略,社交性行为和冒险冲动。男性的冒险冲动高于女性(d = 0.34),路径分析表明,这是男女同性攻击和社会性交的常见原因。但是,它并没有完全介导同性攻击和社会性行为中的性别差异。结果表明,同性攻击和社会性行为具有共同的心理机制,但是要充分说明攻击中的性别差异,则需要对冲动风险进行更敏感的分析,并考虑二进过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号