首页> 外文期刊>Experimental and clinical transplantation >Perceptions of Patient Candidacy for Kidney Transplant in the United States: A Qualitative Study Comparing Rural and Urban Nephrologists
【24h】

Perceptions of Patient Candidacy for Kidney Transplant in the United States: A Qualitative Study Comparing Rural and Urban Nephrologists

机译:在美国对肾脏移植患者候选资格的认识:比较农村和城市肾脏科医生的定性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives: To explore different perceptions of urban and rural nephrologists regarding patient suitability for transplant. Materials and Methods: We conducted 4 focus groups, each consisting of 4 to 6 nephrologists practicing in either a rural (n=9) or an urban setting (n=11). A topic guide was developed and modified according to pilot testing. Broadly stated, open-ended queries probed perceptions about the ideal or suboptimal candidates for transplant, perceived barriers to transplant, views regarding providing information to patients, and strategies that could improve transplant rates. At the sessions, all audio was recorded and professionally transcribed. Responses were pooled, deidentified, and analyzed using qualitative thematic content analysis. Results: In considering candidacy, urban participants mentioned "age," "compliance," and "functional status"; "support" was a more-prevalent theme among rural nephrologists. Urban physicians discussed the expected effect of a transplant on a subject's quality of life. As barriers to transplant, "evaluation time" was mentioned by urban groups only, and "distance to transplant center" was suggested by rural nephrologists only. To improve transplant rates, urban nephrologists suggested strategies that would increase the donor pool. Rural nephrologists, on the other hand, suggested a collaboration between nephrologists and the transplant center, "limiting listing eligibility" and "financial assistance." Rural nephrologists suggested providing comparisons of modalities and information about selecting subjects. Conclusions: This qualitative study underscores geographic differences in perceptions of nephrologists regarding patient candidacy for kidney transplant, perceived barriers to kidney transplant, and proposed strategies to increase rates of kidney transplant. These differences are potential contributors to geographic variations in referring patients for kidney transplant.
机译:目的:探讨城市和乡村肾脏科医生对患者移植的适应性的不同看法。资料和方法:我们进行了4个焦点小组,每个小组由4至6名肾脏科医生在农村(n = 9)或城市(n = 11)执业。根据先导测试开发并修改了主题指南。概括地说,开放式查询探讨了对理想或次优移植候选者的看法,对移植的感知障碍,关于向患者提供信息的观点以及可以提高移植率的策略。在会议上,所有音频均被记录并进行专业转录。使用定性主题内容分析对响应进行汇总,确定和分析。结果:在考虑候选资格时,城市参与者提到了“年龄”,“遵从性”和“功能状态”; “支持”是农村肾脏病学家中比较普遍的主题。城市医生讨论了移植对受试者生活质量的预期影响。作为移植的障碍,只有城市人群提到了“评估时间”,而农村肾脏病学家仅提出了“到移植中心的距离”。为了提高移植率,城市肾脏病专家提出了增加供体库的策略。另一方面,农村肾脏病学家建议肾脏病学家和移植中心之间进行合作,“限制上市资格”和“财政援助”。农村肾脏病学家建议提供有关选择对象的方式和信息的比较。结论:这项定性研究强调了肾脏科医生对患者肾移植候选资格,肾移植障碍的认识以及提出提高肾移植率的策略方面的地理差异。这些差异可能是导致转介患者进行肾脏移植的地域差异的潜在原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号