首页> 外文期刊>Emergency Medicine International >The Efficacy of Nebulized Furosemide and Salbutamol Compared with Salbutamol Alone in Reactive Airway Disease: A Double Blind Randomized, Clinical Trial
【24h】

The Efficacy of Nebulized Furosemide and Salbutamol Compared with Salbutamol Alone in Reactive Airway Disease: A Double Blind Randomized, Clinical Trial

机译:雾化的速尿和沙丁胺醇比单独的沙丁胺醇在反应性气道疾病中的疗效:一项双盲随机临床试验

获取原文
       

摘要

We undertook this randomized clinical trial to investigate whether adding furosemide to salbutamol could improve the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and clinical signs of reactive airway disease (RAD) patients. Eligible 18- to 55-year-old patients were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. Patients received 5 mg of nebulized salbutamol and 40 mg of nebulized furosemide in the intervention group and 5 mg of nebulized salbutamol alone in the control group. Patients in both groups received 100 mg of methylprednisolone intravenously stat. Severity of the RAD was estimated before and 45 minutes after treatment in both groups. PEFR was estimated before treatment and at 15, 30, and 45 minutes later. Ninety patients were enrolled, 45 in each group. There were no significant differences between two groups regarding gender, mean age, and normalized PEFR. The baseline mean PEFR was not significantly different between groups (P=0.58). A repeated measure analysis of variance revealed that the differences between the two treatments was significant (P=0.0001) and the behavior of two treatments was not similar across the time (P=0.001). Comparison of clinical severity of acute RAD revealed no significant differences between groups at the end of the trial (0.06). This study showed that adding nebulized furosemide to salbutamol in RAD patients improved PEFR.
机译:我们进行了这项随机临床试验,以调查在沙丁胺醇中添加速尿是否可以改善峰值呼气流速(PEFR)和反应性气道疾病(RAD)患者的临床体征。符合条件的18至55岁患者被随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组患者分别接受5μmg雾化的沙丁胺醇和40μmg雾化的呋塞米,而对照组仅接受5μmg雾化的沙丁胺醇。两组患者均接受100μmg甲基强的松龙静注。两组均在治疗前和治疗后45分钟评估RAD的严重程度。在治疗前以及15、30和45分钟后评估PEFR。共有90名患者入组,每组45名。两组在性别,平均年龄和正常PEFR方面无显着差异。两组之间的基线平均PEFR无显着差异(P = 0.58)。重复测量方差分析发现,两种处理之间的差异非常显着(P = 0.0001),并且两种处理的行为在整个时间上都不相似(P = 0.001)。在试验结束时,急性RAD的临床严重程度比较表明两组之间无显着差异(0.06)。这项研究表明,在RAD患者中向沙丁胺醇中添加雾化速尿可改善PEFR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号