首页> 外文期刊>Emergency Medicine International >CPR Guidance by an Emergency Physician via Video Call: A Simulation Study
【24h】

CPR Guidance by an Emergency Physician via Video Call: A Simulation Study

机译:急诊医师通过视频通话进行心肺复苏术指导:模拟研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background. In South Korea, the prehospital treatment of cardiac arrest is generally led by an emergency medical technician-paramedic (EMT-P), and defibrillation is delivered by the automatic external defibrillator (AED). This study aimed at examining the effects of direct medical guidance by an emergency physician through a video call that enabled prompt manual defibrillation. Methods. Two-hundred eighty-eight paramedics based in Gyeonggi Province were studied for four months, from July to November 2015. The participants were divided into 96 teams, and the teams were randomly divided into either a conventional group that was to use the AED or a video call guidance group which was to use the manual defibrillators, with 48 teams in each group. The time to first defibrillation, total hands-off time, and hands-off ratio were compared between the two groups. Results. The median value of the time to the first defibrillation was significantly shorter in the video call guidance group (56 s) than in the conventional group (73 s) (p<0.001). The median value of the total hands-off time was also significantly shorter (228 vs. 285.5 s) (p<0.001), and the hands-off ratio, defined as the proportion of hands-off time out of the total CPR time, was significantly shorter in the video call guidance group (0.32 vs. 0.41) (p<0.001). Conclusion. Physician-guided CPR with a video call enabled prompt manual defibrillation and significantly shortened the time required for first defibrillation, hands-off time, and hands-off ratio in simulated cases of prehospital cardiac arrest.
机译:背景。在韩国,心脏骤停的院前治疗通常由急救医疗技术人员(EMT-P)领导,而除颤则由自动体外除颤器(AED)进行。这项研究旨在检查急诊医师通过视频呼叫实现直接手动除颤的直接医学指导的效果。方法。从2015年7月至2015年11月,对位于京畿道的288个护理人员进行了为期四个月的研究。参与者分为96个小组,这些小组被随机分为使用AED的常规组或一组。视频通话指导小组,该小组将使用手动除颤器,每个小组有48个小组。比较两组的初次除颤时间,总的不动手时间和不动手率。结果。视频通话指导组(56 s)的首次除颤时间的中位数明显短于常规组(73 s)(p <0.001)。总放手时间的中位数也显着缩短(228 vs. 285.5 s)(p <0.001),放手率定义为放手时间在总CPR时间中所占的比例,视频通话指导组的访问时间明显缩短(分别为0.32和0.41)(p <0.001)。结论。医师指导的CPR和视频通话可实现手动除颤,并在模拟院前心脏骤停的情况下大大缩短了首次除颤所需的时间,放手时间和放手率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号