首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >Influence of admission glucose profile and hemoglobin A1c on complications of acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients
【24h】

Influence of admission glucose profile and hemoglobin A1c on complications of acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients

机译:糖尿病患者急性心肌梗死合并糖分和血红蛋白A1c的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients have a double higher short-term mortality rate after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than non-diabetic ones. Admission glucose level has been already concerned as an independent risk factor for the long-term prognosis after myocardial infarction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of admission glucose profile (AGP) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) on complications of the AMI in patients with type 2 diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was based on 76 diabetic patients hospitalized with first-ever AMI. Admission glucose profile was estimated as mean value of the first six blood glucose values, since HbA1c was measured from the blood sampled in the first morning after the admission to hospital. All post-infarction complications are divided into electrical and mechanical ones. ROC curves are used to analyze predictive values of admission glucose profile and HbA1c for developing post-infarction complications. RESULTS: Admission glucose profile is a significant (p = 0.001) predictor of electrical complications with 12.25 mmol/L cut-off value (sensitivity 77.3%; specificity 64.5%), while it is not significant (p > 0.05) for mechanical complication (cut-off value 16.85 mmol/L; sensitivity 45.2%; specificity 77.8%). HbA1c is not enough good for the complication prediction (p > 0.05). Considering electrical and mechanical complications aggregately, AGP is even more significant (p = 0.000) with 14.85 mmol/L cut-off value (sensitivity 54.4%; specificity 94.7%), and HbA1c is significant, as well (p = 0.013, too with 9.07 % cut-off value (sensitivity 57.9%; specificity 78.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the predictability between AGP and HbA1c, in our sample, the first one seems to be the better one. Admission glucose profile and HbA1c should be the obligatory laboratory tests performed at the time of hospital admission after the heart attack.
机译:背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI)后,糖尿病患者的短期死亡率是非糖尿病患者的两倍。入院血糖水平已被认为是心肌梗死后长期预后的独立危险因素。这项研究的目的是评估2型糖尿病患者的入院葡萄糖谱(AGP)和糖基化血红蛋白(HbA1c)对AMI并发症的影响。患者与方法:该研究基于76例首次接受AMI治疗的糖尿病患者。入院血糖曲线估计为前六个血糖值的平均值,因为HbA1c是从入院后第一天早晨采集的血液中测得的。所有梗死后并发症均分为电气和机械并发症。 ROC曲线用于分析发生梗塞后并发症的入院血糖曲线和HbA1c的预测值。结果:入院的血糖水平是电并发症的重要预测指标(p = 0.001),其临界值为12.25 mmol / L(敏感性为77.3%;特异性为64.5%),而对于机械并发症而言则无统计学意义(p> 0.05)(临界值16.85 mmol / L;灵敏度45.2%;特异性77.8%)。 HbA1c不足以用于并发症预测(p> 0.05)。综合考虑电气和机械并发症,AGP更为显着(p = 0.000),其临界值为14.85 mmol / L(敏感性为54.4%;特异性为94.7%),HbA1c也显着(p = 0.013)。临界值为9.07%(敏感性为57.9%;特异性为78.8%)结论:比较样本中AGP和HbA1c的可预测性,第一个似乎更好;入院血糖曲线和HbA1c应该作为实验室心脏病发作后在入院时进行的检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号