首页> 外文期刊>European spine journal >Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10?years
【24h】

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10?years

机译:颈椎病:10年后保守治疗与手术治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery to treat the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (CSM) are any better than those of a conservative approach. A 10-year prospective randomised study was performed. The objective of the study was to compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of CSM. Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups of 32. Group A was treated conservatively while group B was treated surgically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, score of daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and by subjective assessment by the patients themselves. Seventeen patents died of natural, unrelated causes, during the follow-up. A total of 25 patients in the conservatively and 22 in the surgically treated group were used for the final evaluation. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in mJOA score, in subjective evaluation by the patients themselves and in evaluation of video-recordings of daily living activities by two observers blinded to treatment mode. There was neither any difference found in the percentage of patients losing the ability to walk nor in the time taken to cover the 10-m track from a standing start. Comparison of conservative and surgical treatment in mild and moderate forms of CSM in a 10-year follow-up has not shown, on average, a significant difference in results. In both groups, patients get better and worse. According to the power analysis it is necessary admit that these results possess the low ability to answer definitely the question which treatment is better for the patients with a mild and moderate non-progressive CSM because of the low number of patients for the final evaluation and for clinically negligible differences between two compared arms. These findings can serve as a worthy odds-on hypothesis which needs the confirmation...
机译:尚不知道减压手术治疗轻度和中度型脊椎颈椎病(CSM)的结果是否优于保守治疗的结果。进行了为期10年的前瞻性随机研究。该研究的目的是比较轻度和中度,非进行性或缓慢进行性CSM的保守治疗和手术治疗。 64例患者随机分为两组,每组32例。A组采用保守治疗,B组采用手术治疗。通过修改后的JOA评分,步行10分钟的步行时间,视频记录的日常活动评分以及两名不了解治疗类型的观察员对临床结果进行评估,并由患者自己进行主观评估。在后续行动中,有17项专利死于与自然无关的原因。保守评估中共有25例患者接受了手术治疗,保守治疗组中有22例接受了最终评估。两组患者的mJOA评分,患者自身的主观评价以及两名不愿接受治疗方式的观察者对日常生活活动的视频记录的评价在统计学上均无统计学差异。在失去行走能力的患者百分比和从站立开始掩盖10米长轨道所需的时间方面,都没有发现任何差异。平均而言,在10年的随访中,对轻度和中度CSM保守治疗和手术治疗的比较并未显示出明显的差异。两组患者的病情都会越来越好。根据功效分析,有必要承认,这些结果肯定无法回答以下问题:对于最终评估和治疗的患者人数较少,对于轻度和中度非进行性CSM患者哪种治疗更好两个比较臂之间的临床差异可忽略不计。这些发现可以作为值得证实的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号