首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >Clinical treatment efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy combined with rhPro-UK thrombolysis for acute moderate/severe cerebral infarction
【24h】

Clinical treatment efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy combined with rhPro-UK thrombolysis for acute moderate/severe cerebral infarction

机译:机械血栓切除术联合rhPro-UK溶栓治疗急性中/重度脑梗死的临床疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare clinical efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy combined with rhPro-UK thrombolysis on moderate or severe acute brain infarction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 90 acute cerebral infarction patients due to artery stenosis or blockade from May 2016 to May 2017 were recruited and randomly assigned into thrombolysis group (N = 30), mechanical thrombectomy (N = 30), and combined treatment group (N = 30). Clinical information was collected. Thrombolysis group received rhPro-UK, mechanical thrombectomy group received Solitaire scaffold, and combined group received rhPro-UK after Solitaire scaffold. Barthel scale and NIHSS scale were used to evaluate the quality of life and mental deficit of patients. Modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) was compared among three groups, along with the observation of hemorrhage, neurological recovery within 90 days, and adverse effects. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in NIHSS within 24 h of treatment among three groups (p 0.05), but the decreasing levels were shown at 24 h, 7 days, and 90 days comparing to those before treatment (p 0.05), respectively, which were significantly lower than that in combined group (83.33%) (p 0.05). Moreover, neither significant difference of coagulation function nor platelet count was found among three groups (p 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy combined with thrombolysis presented favorable efficiency in the treatment of moderate to severe acute cerebral infarction than single treatment, among which the occurrence of adverse effects were similar.
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较机械血栓切除术联合rhPro-UK溶栓治疗中度或重度急性脑梗死的临床效果。患者与方法:招募2016年5月至2017年5月因动脉狭窄或阻塞而引起的急性脑梗死患者90例,随机分为溶栓组(N = 30),机械血栓切除术(N = 30)和联合治疗组(N = 30)。收集临床信息。溶栓组接受rhPro-UK,机械血栓切除术组接受Solitaire支架,联合组接受rhPro-UK。使用Barthel量表和NIHSS量表来​​评估患者的生活质量和精神障碍。比较了三组中脑梗死的改良溶栓治疗(mTICI),并观察了出血,90天内的神经功能恢复和不良反应。结果:三组在治疗后24小时内NIHSS差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05),但与治疗前相比,分别在24 h,7天和90天降低水平(p 0.05)。 ,明显低于联合治疗组(83.33%)(p 0.05)。此外,三组之间的凝血功能和血小板计数均无显着性差异(p> 0.05)。结论:机械血栓切除术联合溶栓治疗对中重度急性脑梗死的治疗效果优于单一治疗,且不良反应的发生率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号