首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >Impact of perioperative lidocaine infusion and bis monitorization on remifentanil dosage in hypotensive anesthesia
【24h】

Impact of perioperative lidocaine infusion and bis monitorization on remifentanil dosage in hypotensive anesthesia

机译:围手术期利多卡因输注和bis监测对降压麻醉中瑞芬太尼剂量的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Combination of local and regional anesthetic agents are widely used in emergency and surgical setting and the interaction between the medications used in general anesthesia and these local and/or regional anesthetic becomes a growing concern in current patient management system. The interaction between general anesthetic agents and the local anesthetic agents given epidurally, spinally, intravenously or intramuscularly and the effects of BIS monitorisation on combined propofol-remifentanil anesthesia are examined in several studies. In literature, there is no research investigating the effect of lidocaine infusion on remifentanil and anesthetic dosage used in hypotensive anesthesia. The aim of this study is to examine this effect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 39, ASA I-II patients undergoing elective transsphenoidal endoscopic hypophyseal adenoma excision procedure. After preoperative examination and informed consent of the patient, monitorisation with non invasive blood pressure measurement, electrocardiography, pulse oxymeter and Bispectral Index (BIS) was performed. 0.9% NaCl infusion was started via a 20 G route. Lidocaine (1%) was given as 1.5 mg.kg-1 hour-1 infusion after 1.5 mg.kg-1 bolus dosage given in 10 minutes. Lidocaine infusion was started at the same time with anesthesia induction and was stopped after surgery. 0.9% NaCl was given as bolus dosage and as infusion in control group. Induction was maintained via propofol (1%) with 10 mg (1 ml) doses given in 5 seconds and it was applied in every 15 seconds until BIS 0.05). The duration of anesthesia and surgery were also not different statistically (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant difference between two groups with respect to remifentanil dose (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant difference between two groups with respect to eye opening and extubation times (p > 0.05). When usage rates and amounts of dolantine, paracetamole and novalgine were compared, we found no statistically significant difference between two groups (p > 0.05). Basal mean arterial blood pressure measurements of the patients and mean arterial blood pressure measurements of the patients after induction, after intubation, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes after discharge of surgery and after extubation showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Basal heart rate measurements and the heart rates after induction, after intubation, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes after discharge of surgery and after extubation showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Basal BIS measurements and BIS measurements after induction, after intubation, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes after discharge of surgery and after extubation showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistically significant difference between two groups about different parameters. But new investigations with different local anesthetic agents may show sigificant difference and usage of these local anesthetic agents may be advised.
机译:背景:局部和区域麻醉剂的组合被广泛用于急诊和外科手术中,并且在目前的患者管理系统中,用于全身麻醉的药物与这些局部和/或区域麻醉剂之间的相互作用日益受到关注。在几项研究中,研究了硬膜外,脊髓,静脉内或肌肉内给予全身麻醉剂与局部麻醉剂之间的相互作用以及BIS监测的作用。在文献中,没有研究调查利多卡因输注对瑞芬太尼和降压麻醉所用麻醉剂量的影响。这项研究的目的是检查这种影响。患者和方法:我们研究了39例接受择期经蝶窦内镜下垂体腺瘤切除术的ASA I-II患者。在术前检查并征得患者的知情同意后,进行无创血压测量,心电图,脉搏血氧仪和双光谱指数(BIS)监测。通过20 G途径开始注入0.9%NaCl。在10分钟内以1.5 mg.kg-1推注剂量给药后,以1.5 mg.kg-1 hour-1的剂量注射利多卡因(1%)。利多卡因的灌注在麻醉诱导的同时开始,并在手术后停止。对照组给予0.9%NaCl推注剂量和输注量。在5秒内通过丙泊酚(1%)并以10 mg(1 ml)的剂量维持诱导作用,并每15秒施加一次,直至BIS 0.05)。麻醉和手术的持续时间在统计学上也没有差异(p> 0.05)。两组在瑞芬太尼剂量方面无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。两组在睁眼和拔管时间方面无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。比较多兰汀,对乙酰氨基酚和Novalgine的使用率和用量,我们发现两组之间无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。引产后,插管后,出院后1分钟,5分钟,10分钟,15分钟和拔管后患者的基础平均动脉血压测量值和患者的平均动脉血压测量值均无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。基础心率测量和引产后,插管后,出院后1分钟,5分钟,10分钟,15分钟和拔管后的心率无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。引产后,插管后,出院后1分钟,5分钟,10分钟,15分钟和拔管后的基础BIS测量和BIS测量均无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。结论:我们发现两组之间关于不同参数没有统计学上的显着差异。但是,使用不同的局部麻醉剂进行的新研究可能显示出显着差异,建议使用这些局部麻醉剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号