...
首页> 外文期刊>European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. >Micro-CT evaluation of two different root canal filling techniques
【24h】

Micro-CT evaluation of two different root canal filling techniques

机译:两种不同根管充填技术的Micro-CT评估

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the frequency and volume of voids in root canals obturated with two different filling techniques using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted permanent teeth were selected and decoronated. The roots were instrumented with WaveOne (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) to a large size until working length and irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. Then, the samples were filled using a single-cone (n = 20) or the GuttaCore technique (n = 20). The presence and volume (mm3) of voids (internal, external, and combined) was calculated in the coronal, medium, and apical thirds using micro-CT (SkyScan 1072; SkyScan, Kartuizersweg, Belgium). Statistical analyses were performed using the χ2-test and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p0.05).
机译:目的:本研究的目的是使用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)技术比较两种不同填充技术对根管阻塞的空洞的频率和体积。材料与方法:选择并修饰40颗单根恒牙。用WaveOne(Dentsply Maillefer,Ballaigues,瑞士)对根进行测量,直到工作长度,然后用5.25%的次氯酸钠和17%的EDTA灌溉。然后,使用单锥度(n = 20)或GuttaCore技术(n = 20)填充样品。使用micro-CT(SkyScan 1072; SkyScan,Kartuizersweg,比利时)在冠状,中层和顶端三分之二中计算空隙(内部,外部和组合)的存在和体积(mm3)。使用χ2检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析(p0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号