...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry >Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?
【24h】

Does Implant-Abutment Interface affect Marginal Bone Levels around Implants?

机译:种植体-基台界面会影响种植体周围的边缘骨水平吗?

获取原文

摘要

Objective The use of dental implants with different types of surface roughness and implant-abutment interface has brought about a situation of marginal bone loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze and compare marginal bone levels of different types of osseointegrated dental implants with platform switch (Group A: Ankylos, Mannheim, Germany) and platform match (Group B: Dentsply Xive, Mannheim, Germany, and Group C: MIS Implant Technologies, Karmiel, Israel). Materials and Methods One hundred and seven patients (52 men and 55 women) with a mean age of 54.79 (standard deviation ± 12.35) years and a total of 321 dental implants (Group A, n = 198; Group B, n = 58; and Group C, n = 65) placed in a private practice between April 2006 and May 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. In addition to demographic information and implant characteristics, marginal bone levels were evaluated by Image J (Wayne Rasband, National Institute of Health, Maryland) program. Results The mean age of all patients was 54.79 ± 12.35 years, and 51.5% of them were women. Implants supporting fixed bridge were most commonly used in all groups (65%), whereas only 20% were restored with a single crown and 15% with overdentures. In total, 47.5% of all implants showed no marginal bone loss. Mean bone loss in Group A was significantly lower (0.81 ± 1.60 mm) as compared to Group B (1.58 ± 1.59 mm) and Group C (1.18 ± 1.36) (p 0.005). Conclusion Among different types of dental implants, platform switch seems to preserve marginal bone levels and increase the long-term success of dental implants.
机译:目的使用具有不同类型的表面粗糙度和种植体-基台界面的牙科植入物引起了边缘性骨丢失的情况。因此,本研究的目的是分析和比较具有平台开关(A组:安克洛斯,曼海姆,德国)和平台匹配(B组:Dentsply Xive,曼海姆,德国,和C组:MIS植入技术,以色列卡米尔。材料和方法一百零七名患者(男52例,女55例),平均年龄54.79岁(标准差±12.35)岁,共植入321颗牙种植体(A组,n = 198; B组,n = 58; A组,n = 58; B组,n = 58。回顾性分析了2006年4月至2015年5月间私人执业的C组(n = 65)。除了人口统计学信息和植入物特征外,边缘边缘的骨水平还通过Image J(马里兰州国立卫生研究院的Wayne Rasband)评估。结果所有患者的平均年龄为54.79±12.35岁,其中女性为51.5%。支持固定牙桥的植入物在所有组中最常用(65%),而仅使用一个冠修复的修复物仅占20%,使用覆盖义齿修复的修复物占15%。总体而言,所有植入物的47.5%没有出现边缘骨丢失。与B组(1.58±1.59 mm)和C组(1.18±1.36)相比,A组的平均骨丢失量显着降低(0.81±1.60 mm)(p <0.005)。结论在不同类型的牙植入物中,平台转换似乎可以保留边缘骨水平并增加牙植入物的长期成功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号