首页> 外文期刊>Epidemiologic Perspectives and Innovations >Can we use biomarkers in combination with self-reports to strengthen the analysis of nutritional epidemiologic studies?
【24h】

Can we use biomarkers in combination with self-reports to strengthen the analysis of nutritional epidemiologic studies?

机译:我们可以结合使用生物标志物和自我报告来加强对营养流行病学研究的分析吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Identifying diet-disease relationships in nutritional cohort studies is plagued by the measurement error in self-reported intakes. The authors propose using biomarkers known to be correlated with dietary intake, so as to strengthen analyses of diet-disease hypotheses. The authors consider combining self-reported intakes and biomarker levels using principal components, Howe's method, or a joint statistical test of effects in a bivariate model. They compared the statistical power of these methods with that of conventional univariate analyses of self-reported intake or of biomarker level. They used computer simulation of different disease risk models, with input parameters based on data from the literature on the relationship between lutein intake and age-related macular degeneration. The results showed that if the dietary effect on disease was fully mediated through the biomarker level, then the univariate analysis of the biomarker was the most powerful approach. However, combination methods, particularly principal components and Howe's method, were not greatly inferior in this situation, and were as good as, or better than, univariate biomarker analysis if mediation was only partial or non-existent. In some circumstances sample size requirements were reduced to 20-50% of those required for conventional analyses of self-reported intake. The authors conclude that (i) including biomarker data in addition to the usual dietary data in a cohort could greatly strengthen the investigation of diet-disease relationships, and (ii) when the extent of mediation through the biomarker is unknown, use of principal components or Howe's method appears a good strategy.
机译:在营养人群研究中确定饮食与疾病的关系受到自我报告摄入量测量误差的困扰。作者建议使用已知与饮食摄入量相关的生物标志物,以加强对饮食疾病假说的分析。作者考虑使用主要成分,Howe方法或双变量模型中联合效果的联合统计检验来结合自我报告的摄入量和生物标志物水平。他们将这些方法的统计能力与对自我报告摄入量或生物标志物水平的常规单变量分析的统计能力进行了比较。他们使用了不同疾病风险模型的计算机模拟,并基于来自有关叶黄素摄入与年龄相关性黄斑变性之间关系的文献数据的输入参数。结果表明,如果饮食对疾病的影响完全是通过生物标志物水平介导的,那么对生物标志物进行单变量分析是最有效的方法。但是,在这种情况下,组合方法(尤其是主要成分和Howe方法)并不逊色,并且在仅部分或不存在中介的情况下,与单变量生物标志物分析一样好,甚至优于单变量生物标志物分析。在某些情况下,样本量要求降低到了常规的自我报告摄入量分析要求的20-50%。作者得出的结论是:(i)在队列中除了常规饮食数据外还包括生物标志物数据,可以大大加强对饮食疾病关系的调查;(ii)当通过生物标志物进行调解的程度未知时,使用主要成分或豪的方法似乎是一个很好的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号