首页> 外文期刊>EPJ Photovoltaics >Comparison of silicon oxide and silicon carbide absorber materials in silicon thin-film solar cells
【24h】

Comparison of silicon oxide and silicon carbide absorber materials in silicon thin-film solar cells

机译:硅薄膜太阳能电池中氧化硅和碳化硅吸收剂材料的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Since solar energy conversion by photovoltaics is most efficient for photon energies at the bandgap of the absorbing material the idea of combining absorber layers with different bandgaps in a multijunction cell has become popular. In silicon thin-film photovoltaics a multijunction stack with more than two subcells requires a high bandgap amorphous silicon alloy top cell absorber to achieve an optimal bandgap combination. We address the question whether amorphous silicon carbide (a-SiC:H) or amorphous silicon oxide (a-SiO:H) is more suited for this type of top cell absorber. Our single cell results show a better performance of amorphous silicon carbide with respect to fill factor and especially open circuit voltage at equivalent Tauc bandgaps. The microstructure factor of single layers indicates less void structure in amorphous silicon carbide than in amorphous silicon oxide. Yet photoconductivity of silicon oxide films seems to be higher which could be explained by the material being not truly intrinsic. On the other hand better cell performance of amorphous silicon carbide absorber layers might be connected to better hole transport in the cell.
机译:由于在吸收材料的带隙处通过光电转换太阳能对光子能量最有效,因此在多结电池中组合具有不同带隙的吸收层的想法已经流行。在硅薄膜光伏电池中,具有两个以上子电池的多结堆叠需要高带隙非晶硅合金顶部电池吸收器,以实现最佳的带隙组合。我们解决了以下问题:非晶碳化硅(a-SiC:H)还是非晶氧化硅(a-SiO:H)更适合此类顶部电池吸收器。我们的单电池结果表明,相对于填充因子,尤其是在等效Tauc带隙下的开路电压,非晶碳化硅具有更好的性能。单层的微观结构因子表明非晶态碳化硅中的空隙结构比非晶态氧化硅中的少。然而,氧化硅膜的光电导性似乎更高,这可以用该材料不是真正本征来解释。另一方面,非晶碳化硅吸收层的更好的电池性能可能与电池中更好的空穴传输有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号