首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Natural Resources Research >The State of Research on Effectiveness and Equity (2Es) in Forests Management Regimes in Cameroon and Its Relevance for REDD+
【24h】

The State of Research on Effectiveness and Equity (2Es) in Forests Management Regimes in Cameroon and Its Relevance for REDD+

机译:喀麦隆森林管理体制中的有效性和公平性(2E)研究现状及其与REDD +的关联

获取原文
           

摘要

The process of designing and implementing the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) mechanism is gaining grounds in many tropical forest countries. There are concerns on the potentials of the existing forest management regimes to provide the necessary conditions for a successful REDD+ mechanism. This paper narrows this debate to Cameroon and examines past research on two forest regimes – community forests and state forests regimes. It examines findings on equity in benefit sharing and the effectiveness of regimes to maintain or increase forest cover, and assess their compatibility with REDD+ exigencies. The paper argues that: (1) it is too early to draw conclusions on a suitable regime for REDD+ in Cameroon. 13, out of 14 research papers published up to 2011 accentuate on equity in benefit sharing, and the two regimes show proof of limited guarantee for the much expected REDD+ safeguards, this includes failures in vertical and horizontal distribution of benefits; (2) there is deficiency in studies on effectiveness of the forest regimes in managing forest cover as indicated by only 3 of the 14 studies. Despite the shortcomings in practice, certain elements of the forest legislation in Cameroon offer better opportunities for REDD+. This paper recommends more in-depth research based on rigorous methodologies to provide better bases for practitioners and policy makers to draw lessons from the management outcomes of the different regimes, which is relevant for the design of the national REDD+ policy strategy in Cameroon.
机译:在许多热带森林国家,设计和实施“减少森林砍伐和森林退化所致排放量”(REDD +)机制的过程正在取得进展。人们担心现有森林管理制度为成功的REDD +机制提供必要条件的潜力。本文将讨论范围缩小到喀麦隆,并考察了过去对两种森林制度的研究,即社区森林制度和国家森林制度。它审查了有关利益共享公平性的研究结果,以及维持或增加森林覆盖率制度的有效性,并评估了其与REDD +紧急情况的兼容性。该论文认为:(1)现在就喀麦隆针对REDD +的合适制度得出结论还为时过早。截至2011年发表的14篇研究论文中,有13篇着重于利益共享的公平性,这两种制度都显示出对备受期待的REDD +保障措施的有限保证的证据,其中包括利益的纵向和横向分配失败; (2)仅在14项研究中的3项中,关于森林制度在管理森林覆盖率方面的有效性研究不足。尽管存在实践中的缺陷,但喀麦隆森林立法的某些要素为REDD +提供了更好的机会。本文建议在严格方法的基础上进行更深入的研究,以为从业者和政策制定者从不同政权的管理成果中吸取教训提供更好的基础,这与喀麦隆国家REDD +政策战略的设计有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号