...
首页> 外文期刊>eLife journal >Acknowledging selection at sub-organismal levels resolves controversy on pro-cooperation mechanisms
【24h】

Acknowledging selection at sub-organismal levels resolves controversy on pro-cooperation mechanisms

机译:承认亚有机体的选择解决了关于亲合作机制的争议

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cooperators who pay a cost to produce publically-available benefits can be exploited by cheaters who do not contribute fairly. How might cooperation persist against cheaters? Two classes of mechanisms are known to promote cooperation 'partner choice', where a cooperator preferentially interacts with cooperative over cheating partners; and 'partner fidelity feedback', where repeated interactions between individuals ensure that cheaters suffer as their cooperative partners languish (see, for example, Momeni et al., 2013). However when both mechanisms can act, differentiating them has generated controversy. Here, I resolve this controversy by noting that selection can operate on organismal and sub-organismal 'entities' such that partner fidelity feedback at sub-organismal level can appear as partner choice at organismal level. I also show that cooperation between multicellular eukaryotes and mitochondria is promoted by partner fidelity feedback and partner choice between sub-organismal entities, in addition to being promoted by partner fidelity feedback between hosts and symbionts, as was previously known.
机译:为产生可公开获得的利益而付出代价的合作者可能会被不公平贡献的作弊者利用。合作如何持续对抗作弊者?众所周知,有两类机制可以促进合作“伙伴选择”,即合作者优先于合作伙伴而不是作弊伙伴进行合作。以及“合作伙伴忠诚度反馈”,其中个人之间的反复互动可确保作弊者在其合作伙伴陷入困境时遭受苦难(例如,参见Momeni等人,2013)。但是,当两种机制都可以起作用时,区分它们会引起争议。在这里,我通过指出选择可以在有机体和亚有机体“实体”上进行操作来解决这一争议,以便在亚有机体水平上进行伙伴忠诚度反馈可以在有机体水平上作为伙伴选择。我还表明,多细胞真核生物和线粒体之间的合作除了通过宿主和共生体之间的伙伴忠诚度反馈促进外,还通过伙伴忠诚度反馈和亚有机实体之间的伙伴选择来促进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号