首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia >Comparative study of implicit memory during bispectral index guided total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia
【24h】

Comparative study of implicit memory during bispectral index guided total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia

机译:双光谱指数指导下全静脉麻醉与七氟醚吸入麻醉期间内隐记忆的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Several studies that investigate the implicit memory under general anesthesia revealed conflicting results. Limitations may be due to failure to control depth of anesthesia. This prospective randomized study was designed to compare the implicit memory during total intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia. Method Fourty patients ASA I and II undergoing orthopedic procedures under BIS-guided (40–60) general anesthesia were tested for implicit memory of previously introduced auditory material. Patients were divided into two groups (each group 20 patient). Group I, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with propofol, fentanyl and cis-atracurium. Group II, anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane, fentanyl and cis-atracurium. Explicit memory was evaluated by asking four standard questions regarding intra-operative awareness. Free recall and recognition tests for implicit memory testing were carried out 30 min and 120 min after recovery. Results No participant manifested explicit recall according to the 4-question interview. None of the patients gave a free recall of the presented items during anesthesia in the immediate and delayed tests of memory. In the recognition tests, immediate test (5%) and (0%) of the patients indicated correctly the presented words in TIVA and sevoflurane group respectively, in delayed test (10%) in TIVA group and (5%) in sevoflurane group. These results are not significant for implicit memory. Conclusion There was no significant evidence of implicit memory in the two groups. BIS – controlled anesthesia appears to abolish implicit memory.
机译:背景几项研究对全身麻醉下的内隐记忆进行了研究,结果揭示了相互矛盾的结果。局限性可能是由于无法控制麻醉深度。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较全静脉麻醉与吸入麻醉期间的内隐记忆。方法对接受BIS指导(40-60)全身麻醉的40例ASA I和II接受整形外科手术的患者进行了先前引入的听觉材料的内隐记忆测试。将患者分为两组(每组20位患者)。第一组,异丙酚诱导麻醉,丙泊酚,芬太尼和顺式阿曲库铵维持麻醉。第二组麻醉是用异丙酚诱导的,并用七氟醚,芬太尼和顺式阿曲库铵维持麻醉。通过询问关于术中意识的四个标准问题来评估显式记忆。恢复后分别进行30分钟和120分钟的免费回忆和识别测试,以进行隐式内存测试。结果根据4个问题的访谈,没有参与者表现出明显的回忆。在立即和延迟的记忆测试中,没有患者在麻醉期间免费召回所提供的物品。在识别测试中,立即测试(5%)和(0%)的患者分别正确显示了TIVA和七氟醚组中的提示单词,在延迟测试中(TIVA组)(10%)和七氟醚组(5%)正确显示了单词。这些结果对于隐式内存并不重要。结论两组均没有明显的隐性记忆证据。 BIS –麻醉控制似乎可以消除内隐记忆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号