首页> 外文期刊>Einstein (So Paulo) >Comparison between laparoscopic and subcostal mini-incision for live donor nephrectomy
【24h】

Comparison between laparoscopic and subcostal mini-incision for live donor nephrectomy

机译:活体供者肾切除术的腹腔镜和肋下微小切口的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with open donor nephrectomy. Methods: A non-randomized prospective analysis was conducted of living donor kidney transplantations (118 open donor nephrectomies; 57 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies) between January 2005 and December 2007 in the Kidney Transplantation Unit of Hospital das Clínicas of Faculdade de Medicina of the Universidade de S?o Paulo. Results: Mean donor operative time, mean donor hospital stay, mean postoperative creatinine values, and rates of complications and graft survival were similar for both groups. A significant statistical difference in warm ischemia time was observed between the open donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy groups (p 0.001). There was only one conversion in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure for a donor nephrectomy, comparable to an open procedure with similar results despite a longer warm ischemia time.
机译:摘要目的:本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜供体肾切除术与开放供体肾切除术的结果。方法:对2005年1月至2007年12月间在南加州大学医学院附属医院的肾脏移植科进行的活体供体肾脏移植(118个开放供体肾切除术; 57例腹腔镜供体肾切除术)进行了非随机前瞻性分析。 Paulo。结果:两组的平均供体手术时间,平均供体住院时间,平均术后肌酐值,并发症发生率和移植物存活率相似。在开放供体肾切除术和腹腔镜供体肾切除术组之间观察到温暖的缺血时间有统计学差异(p <0.001)。腹腔镜供体肾切除术组只有一次转换。结论:腹腔镜供体肾切除术是一种安全的供体肾切除术,与开放手术相当,尽管温暖的缺血时间更长,但结果相似。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号