首页> 外文期刊>Iranian red crescent medical journal >Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions
【24h】

Comparison of Three Interview Methods on Response Pattern to Sensitive and Non-Sensitive Questions

机译:三种针对敏感和非敏感问题的回答方式的访谈方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

To get more precise responses when gathering information about sensitive topics such as drug use, it is important to use the most optimal method. Objectives: This study was carried out to address the impact of three interview methods (street-based, household, and telephone interviews) on response pattern to sensitive and non-sensitive questions in terms of participation, disclosure and discontinuing rates. Patients and Methods: We selected three culturally diverse major cities of Iran. Then, we randomly selected 300 subjects, 100 for each type of interview, from each major city (899 in total). For street-based interviews only pedestrians who were walking alone were recruited, for household interviews only one individual from each house participated (3-4 houses in each alley were selected), and for telephone interviews we selected phone numbers using a random number list. We asked five non-sensitive and five sensitive (related to drug use and sexual contact among their personal network) questions. Results: For telephone and household interviews, relative to street-based interviews, participants were less likely to disclose alcohol and drug-related behaviors (Adjusted OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60- 0.97) and sexual behaviors among their network (Adjusted OR telephone/street-based = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.39- 1.07 and Adjusted OR household/ street-based = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.33- 0.95). We found that participants who were interviewed via the telephone were more likely (Adjusted OR = 1.24) and those who were interviewed at home were less likely (Adjusted OR = 0.86) to report non-sensitive information compared to participants who were interviewed on the street; however, these findings were not statistically significant. The largest participation rate and the least discontinuation rate were observed for household interviews. Conclusions: It seems that the methods of interview effect response to both sensitive and non-sensitive questions. We believe that for street-based interviews, respondents may disclose more sensitive information than telephone and household interviews.
机译:为了在收集有关毒品使用等敏感话题的信息时获得更准确的响应,使用最佳方法非常重要。目标:进行这项研究是为了探讨三种访谈方法(基于街道,家庭和电话访谈)对参与,披露和终止率方面对敏感和非敏感问题的回答方式的影响。患者和方法:我们选择了伊朗三个文化差异较大的主要城市。然后,我们从每个主要城市(共899个)中随机选择了300个主题,每种访谈类型为100个。对于基于街道的采访,仅招募了独自行走的行人;对于家庭采访,每个房屋仅邀请一个人参加(每个胡同中选择了3-4所房屋);对于电话采访,我们使用随机号码列表选择了电话号码。我们问了五个不敏感和五个敏感(与他们的个人网络之间的毒品使用和性接触有关)的问题。结果:对于电话和家庭访问,相对于街头访问,参与者不太可能透露与酒精和毒品相关的行为(调整后的OR = 0.76; 95%CI:0.60- 0.97)以及其网络中的性行为(调整后的OR)以电话/街道为基础的= 0.64; 95%CI:0.39-1.07;以家庭或街道为基础的调整后OR = 0.56; 95%CI:0.33- 0.95)。我们发现,与在街上进行访谈的参与者相比,通过电话进行访谈的参与者更有可能(调整后的OR = 1.24),而在家里进行访谈的参与者报告非敏感信息的可能性较小(经调整OR = 0.86)。 ;但是,这些发现在统计上并不显着。家庭访问的参与率最高,中断率最低。结论:访谈方法似乎对敏感和非敏感问题都有反应。我们认为,对于街头访问,受访者可能会比电话访问和家庭访问透露更多敏感信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号