...
首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics >Inducible protective processes in animal systems XIV: Cytogenetic adaptive response induced by EMS or MMS in bone marrow cells of diabetic mouse
【24h】

Inducible protective processes in animal systems XIV: Cytogenetic adaptive response induced by EMS or MMS in bone marrow cells of diabetic mouse

机译:动物系统中的诱导性保护过程XIV:EMS或MMS诱导的糖尿病小鼠骨髓细胞的细胞遗传适应性反应

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Adaptive response has been well studied by employing physical and chemical agents in normal test systems, whereas in diseased conditions very little data are available. Aim of the study To know the presence or absence of adaptive response in diseased condition, alkylating agents such as EMS or MMS have been employed in diabetic mouse. Material and methods To induce diabetes, mice were injected with 180 mg/kg body weight of Stz. Diabetic mice were treated with conditioning (100 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 40 mg/kg body weight of MMS), challenging (300 mg/kg body weight of EMS or 160 mg/kg body weight of MMS) and combined doses of EMS or MMS with 8 h time lag. Parallelly controls were maintained. Mice were sacrificed at 24 or 48 or 72 h RTs. Bone marrow was extracted and slides were prepared by a routine air dry technique by Evans et al. (1964) to analyze the chromosomal aberrations. Results The results show that both the alkylating agents induced exclusively chromatid type of aberrations in both diabetic and non diabetic mice, but it is to be underlined that MMS is a more potent inducer of aberrations than EMS. Eventhough, combined treatment of EMS or MMS induced significantly less chromosomal breaks compared to challenging treatment ( p 0.05) in diabetic mice, EMS induced 40% reduction of breaks, compared to 51.74% by MMS at 24 h RT. This is true to other tested RTs. Conclusion (1) Methylating agents are a more effective inducer of adaptive response than ethylating agents in diabetic mouse. (2) Further, it is interesting to note that the percentage reduction of chromosomal breaks in diabetics is comparatively much less than in non diabetic mouse, inferring that there is variation in adaptive response between diseased and non diseased condition.
机译:背景技术已经通过在正常测试系统中采用物理和化学试剂对自适应响应进行了很好的研究,而在疾病条件下,几乎没有可用的数据。研究的目的为了了解在疾病条件下是否存在适应性反应,已在糖尿病小鼠中使用了烷基化试剂如EMS或MMS。材料和方法为诱发糖尿病,给小鼠注射180 mg / kg体重的Stz。糖尿病小鼠接受调理(100 mg / kg EMS体重或40 mg / kg MMS体重),挑战性(300 mg / kg EMS体重或160 mg / kg MMS体重)和联合剂量的糖尿病小鼠治疗EMS或MMS具有8小时的时滞。维持平行对照。在24或48或72小时RT处死小鼠。提取骨髓并通过Evans等人的常规空气干燥技术制备载玻片。 (1964)分析染色体畸变。结果结果表明,两种烷基化剂在糖尿病和非糖尿病小鼠中均仅诱导染色单体型畸变,但是要强调的是,MMS比EMS更有效地诱导畸变。尽管在糖尿病小鼠中,与挑战性治疗相比,EMS或MMS的联合治疗诱导的染色体断裂明显更少(p <0.05),而在24 h RT时,EMS诱导的断裂减少了40%,而MMS则为51.74%。其他经过测试的RT也是这样。结论(1)甲基化剂比乙基化剂在糖尿病小鼠中更有效地诱导适应性反应。 (2)此外,有趣的是,糖尿病患者的染色体断裂减少百分比相对比非糖尿病小鼠要小得多,这表明患病和非患病状况的适应性反应存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号