首页> 外文期刊>Economies >Economic Freedom and Income Inequality: Does Political Regime Matter?
【24h】

Economic Freedom and Income Inequality: Does Political Regime Matter?

机译:经济自由和收入不平等:政治体制重要吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

There is a growing literature studying the effects of economic freedom and democracy on income inequality; nevertheless, the inequality-effects of both factors are apparently studied separately. This paper revisits the income inequality-economic freedom nexus and uncovers the role of political regime in explaining the relationship. Using the latest inequality data from Standardized World Income Inequality (SWIID) version 5.0 for a sample of countries up to 115 over 1970–2014 period, and via dynamic panel GMM estimation method, an inequality model that explicitly captures the interaction effect of economic freedom and democracy is estimated. The findings demonstrate that economic freedom has positive effect on income inequality. The estimated size of inequality-increasing effects of economic freedom is substantial, ranging between 0.3% and 0.5% per annum. Nevertheless, the findings show that the freedom-induced inequality is attenuated in the presence of a democratic regime in the countries under study. Furthermore, freedom of international trade and market deregulation are shown to be the two most consistently significant liberalization policies across the baseline estimations and various sensitivity tests. The paper is concluded with some policy implications.
机译:越来越多的文献研究经济自由和民主对收入不平等的影响。但是,显然要分别研究这两个因素的不平等效应。本文回顾了收入不平等与经济自由之间的联系,揭示了政治制度在解释这种关系中的作用。使用1970-2014年期间115个国家/地区的样本,使用标准世界收入不平等(SWIID)版本5.0中的最新不平等数据,并通过动态面板GMM估算方法,该不平等模型明确捕捉了经济自由度和民主是估计的。研究结果表明,经济自由对收入不平等具有积极影响。经济自由带来的不平等加剧影响的估计规模很大,每年在0.3%至0.5%之间。然而,研究结果表明,在所研究的国家中,民主制度的存在减轻了由自由引起的不平等。此外,在基线估计和各种敏感性测试中,国际贸易自由和市场放松管制被证明是最一致的两个最重要的自由化政策。本文的结论有一些政策含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号