...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Food quality and quantity are more important in explaining foraging of an intermediate‐sized mammalian herbivore than predation risk or competition
【24h】

Food quality and quantity are more important in explaining foraging of an intermediate‐sized mammalian herbivore than predation risk or competition

机译:与解释捕食风险或竞争相比,食品质量和数量对解释中型哺乳动物食草动物的觅食更为重要

获取原文
           

摘要

During times of high activity by predators and competitors, herbivores may be forced to forage in patches of low‐quality food. However, the relative importance in determining where and what herbivores forage still remains unclear, especially for small‐ and intermediate‐sized herbivores. Our objective was to test the relative importance of predator and competitor activity, and forage quality and quantity on the proportion of time spent in a vegetation type and the proportion of time spent foraging by the intermediate‐sized herbivore European hare ( Lepus europaeus ). We studied red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) as a predator species and European rabbit ( Oryctolagus cuniculus ) as a competitor. We investigated the time spent at a location and foraging time of hare using GPS with accelerometers. Forage quality and quantity were analyzed based on hand‐plucked samples of a selection of the locally most important plant species in the diet of hare. Predator activity and competitor activity were investigated using a network of camera traps. Hares spent a higher proportion of time in vegetation types that contained a higher percentage of fibers (i.e., NDF). Besides, hares spent a higher proportion of time in vegetation types that contained relatively low food quantity and quality of forage (i.e., high percentage of fibers) during days that foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ) were more active. Also during days that rabbits ( Oryctolagus cuniculus ) were more active, hares spent a higher proportion of time foraging in vegetation types that contained a relatively low quality of forage. Although predation risk affected space use and foraging behavior, and competition affected foraging behavior, our study shows that food quality and quantity more strongly affected space use and foraging behavior than predation risk or competition. It seems that we need to reconsider the relative importance of the landscape of food in a world of fear and competition.
机译:在捕食者和竞争者活跃的时期,食草动物可能被迫在劣质食品中觅食。但是,在确定草食动物在哪里和什么觅食的相对重要性仍然不清楚,尤其是对于中小型草食动物。我们的目标是测试掠食性动物和竞争者活动的相对重要性以及草食质量和数量对植被类型所花费的时间比例以及中型草食性欧洲野兔(Lepus europaeus)所花费的觅食时间比例的相对重要性。我们研究了作为猎食动物的狐狸(Vulpes vulpes)和作为竞争者的欧洲兔子(Oyctolagus cuniculus)。我们使用带加速度计的GPS调查了在某个地点花费的时间和野兔的觅食时间。根据手工采摘的样品分析了草料的质量和数量,这些样品选自野兔饮食中当地最重要的植物。利用相机陷阱网络调查了捕食者的活动和竞争对手的活动。野兔在含有更高百分比纤维(即NDF)的植被类型中花费了更多的时间。此外,在狐狸(Vulpes vulpes)活跃的日子里,野兔在食物量和草料质量相对较低(即纤维百分比高)的植被类型中花费的时间比例更高。同样在兔子(穴兔)更活跃的日子里,野兔在草料质量相对较低的植被类型中花费了更多的时间进行觅食。尽管捕食风险影响空间利用和觅食行为,而竞争影响觅食行为,但我们的研究表明,食物质量和数量比捕食风险或竞争对空间利用和觅食行为的影响更大。似乎我们需要重新考虑在恐惧和竞争的世界中粮食形势的相对重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号