首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Public Health >Cross-National comparison of antiepileptic drug use: Catalonia, Denmark and Norway, 2007-2011
【24h】

Cross-National comparison of antiepileptic drug use: Catalonia, Denmark and Norway, 2007-2011

机译:全国抗癫痫药物使用的比较:加泰罗尼亚,丹麦和挪威,2007-2011年

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Antiepileptic drug (AED)consumption has increased in recent years mainly from those AEDs marketed since 1990. The purpose is to describe and compare AED consumption in Catalonia, Denmark and Norway. Methods: Population-based descriptive study set in the outpatient healthcare sector. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Prescription Register, Danish Register of Medicinal Product Statistics and DATAMART ? in Catalonia, for 2007-2011. We calculated defined daily doses/1000 inhabitants/day (DID), by age and gender. AEDs were defined according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification (N03A). We reviewed the population covered by the databases, the drug data source and the definition of outpatient healthcare sector to compare the results across the three settings. Results: Total AED use steadily increased over the study period in the three settings. In 2011, consumption was highest in Catalonia (15.20 DID), followed by Denmark (15.06 DID) and Norway (14.24 DID). The “other AEDs” (N03AX) subgroup represented 60% of all AED use. The N03A pattern by gender did not differ across the three settings. Marked differences by age and gender appeared when studying lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin, pregabalin and levetiracetam. Differences among the databases were mainly in the definition of outpatient healthcare setting. Conclusions: There was a rapid increase in “other AEDs” in all three settings. Although we did not have information on the indication for the use of AEDs, the drug data source, population coverage of the database and definition of the healthcare setting helped us interpret the results.
机译:背景:近年来,抗癫痫药(AED)的消费量有所增加,主要是自1990年以来销售的那些AED。其目的是描述和比较加泰罗尼亚,丹麦和挪威的AED消费量。方法:在门诊医疗部门中进行基于人群的描述性研究。数据是从挪威处方药登记簿,丹麦药品统计资料登记簿和DATAMART中检索的。 2007-2011年在加泰罗尼亚举办。我们按年龄和性别计算了定义的每日剂量/ 1000居民/天(DID)。根据解剖治疗化学分类(N03A)定义AED。我们审查了数据库覆盖的人群,药物数据源和门诊医疗保健部门的定义,以比较三种设置的结果。结果:在这三种设置下,整个研究期间AED的总使用量稳定增长。 2011年,加泰罗尼亚(15.20 DID)的消费量最高,其次是丹麦(15.06 DID)和挪威(14.24 DID)。 “其他AED”(N03AX)子组占所有AED使用量的60%。在三种设置中,按性别划分的N03A模式没有差异。研究拉莫三嗪,托吡酯,加巴喷丁,普瑞巴林和左乙拉西坦时,年龄和性别存在明显差异。数据库之间的差异主要在于门诊医疗设置的定义。结论:在所有三种情况下,“其他AED”均迅速增加。尽管我们没有有关使用AED的适应症的信息,但药物数据源,数据库的人群覆盖范围以及医疗机构的定义帮助我们解释了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号