...
首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Public Health >Comparison of multi-state Markov models for cancer progression with different procedures for parameters estimation. An application to breast cancer
【24h】

Comparison of multi-state Markov models for cancer progression with different procedures for parameters estimation. An application to breast cancer

机译:使用参数估计的不同程序比较癌症进展的多状态Markov模型。在乳腺癌中的应用

获取原文

摘要

Background: the knowledge of sojourn time (the duration of the preclinical screen-detectable period) and screening test sensitivity is crucial for understanding the disease progression and the effectiveness of screening programmes. For this purpose a model of the natural history of the disease is needed. The aim of this work is to provide an illustration of the application of multistate Markov models for breast cancer progression to the data of the Florentine screening programme, in order to estimate the sojourn time and sensitivity for breast cancer screening. Methods: three different multi-state Markov models of increasing complexity were used with three different estimation procedures based on non-linear least squares, maximum likelihood, and on a Bayesian approach. All the models produced estimates for screening sensitivity and mean sojourn time. The data used in our application seem to lead to a non-identifiability problem, since the estimation procedures for both the Maximum Likelihood and Non-Linear Least Squares gave estimates that changed with the parameters’ initial values or difficultly converged. In order to take this problem into account we used the Bayesian Approach by incorporating prior information on all the parameters. Results: the mean sojourn time varied between 2-7 years and 3-5 years for women aged 50-59 and 60-69, respectively. When the model complexity was increased a higher variability in estimates was observed among the estimation procedures. The results of the screening sensitivity estimates were highly variable, both among estimation techniques and models - varying between 63% and 100%, and between 77% and 100% for women aged 50-59 and 60-69, respectively. Conclusions: results are in accord with the literature; those obtained through the Bayesian Approach seem to be more reliable.
机译:背景:逗留时间(临床前筛查可检测时间段的持续时间)和筛查试验敏感性的知识对于理解疾病进展和筛查程序的有效性至关重要。为此,需要疾病自然史的模型。这项工作的目的是为了说明多态马尔可夫模型在乳腺癌进展中对佛罗伦萨筛查计划数据的应用,以便估算乳腺癌筛查的停留时间和敏感性。方法:基于非线性最小二乘,最大似然和贝叶斯方法,使用了三种不同的,复杂度不断增加的多态马尔可夫模型,以及三种不同的估计程序。所有模型都产生了筛选敏感性和平均停留时间的估计值。我们的应用程序中使用的数据似乎导致了不可识别性问题,因为针对最大似然和非线性最小二乘的估计程序所得出的估计值随参数的初始值而变化或难以收敛。为了考虑到这个问题,我们使用了贝叶斯方法,将所有参数的先验信息结合在一起。结果:50-59岁和60-69岁女性的平均寄宿时间分别在2-7岁和3-5岁之间。当模型复杂度增加时,在估计程序之间会观察到更大的估计差异。筛查敏感性估算的结果在估算技术和模型之间都存在很大差异-50-59岁和60-69岁的女性分别在63%和100%之间以及77%和100%之间变化。结论:结果与文献报道相符。通过贝叶斯方法获得的那些似乎更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号