首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Planning Practice >Processes of Urban and Rural Development: a Comparative Analysis of Europe and China.
【24h】

Processes of Urban and Rural Development: a Comparative Analysis of Europe and China.

机译:城乡发展进程:欧洲与中国的比较分析。

获取原文
       

摘要

China, in its construction fever, has imported from Europe a great range of architectural and design features. The planning systems of China and of most European countries are based on functionalzoning, allowing meaningful comparison. Nonetheless, the process and goals of spatial planning differ markedly and China largely ignores the distinctive progress achieved in the field in Europe. AcrossEurope, the model of planning is undergoing important transformations in the last decades, gradually making decisions concerning landuse more participated, flexible and sustainable, and safeguarding the rural dimension. In contrast, the planning system of China is primarily focused on promoting urban GDP growth and is still based on a top down approach. The inclusion of some key elements of European planning into the Chinese system, with particular reference to laws establishing national standards and comprehensive environmental protection, would benefit China by reducing the internal inequalities between cities and countryside and safeguarding its natural assets.
机译:中国在建筑热中从欧洲进口了许多建筑和设计特征。中国和大多数欧洲国家的规划系统都基于功能分区,可以进行有意义的比较。但是,空间规划的过程和目标明显不同,中国在很大程度上忽略了欧洲在这一领域所取得的独特进展。在整个欧洲,过去几十年中,规划模式正在经历重要的转变,逐渐使土地使用决策更加参与,灵活和可持续,并维护了农村规模。相比之下,中国的规划体系主要侧重于促进城市GDP增长,但仍基于自上而下的方法。将欧洲计划的一些关键要素纳入中国体系,特别是参考建立国家标准和全面环境保护的法律,将通过减少城乡之间的内部不平等并保护其自然资产而使中国受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号