首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Public Health >Comparison among single-phase test, automated screening method and GC/MS for the traceability of ketamine in urine
【24h】

Comparison among single-phase test, automated screening method and GC/MS for the traceability of ketamine in urine

机译:单相测试,自动筛选方法和GC / MS在尿液中氯胺酮可追溯性方面的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND The use of ketamine, for non-medical purpose, results widespread also in Italy. This drug is not searched by institutional centers, charged of the responsibility to realize the execution of toxicological analysis based on the article 187 of The New Italian Highway Code. W e evaluated the reliability of the single-phase test comparing it with an automated screening method and a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to search the presence of ketamine on casualty patients involved in car accidents in Rome. METHODS The screening analysis were performed by a single-phase test (with a cut-off settled at 1000 ng/ml), and an automated immunoenzymatic assay (cut-off settled at 330 ng/ml). The confirmation tests have been realized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS The single-phase test highlighted ten positive samples out of 294. The automated instrument confirmed only six out of ten previous positive samples, meanwhile the instrument found further four positive samples, considered negative by the single-phase test. The presence of ketamine is confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry only in seven samples out of fourteen resulted positives from both screening analysis. Three samples out of seven confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were positive only to ketamine. CONCLUSION Following the law indications, ketamine is not searched : this limit does not make the authorities able to apply the penalties expected for road laws violations. The automation is essential to guarantee the reliability of toxicological screening tests, especially to medico-legal significance. This results highlight the absolutely necessity of the execution of the confirmation test, successively to screening analysis.
机译:背景技术用于非医疗目的的氯胺酮的使用在意大利也很普遍。机构中心未对这种药物进行搜索,而是根据《新意大利高速公路法规》第187条,负责执行毒理学分析。我们评估了单相测试的可靠性,并将其与自动筛选方法和气相色谱-质谱法相比较,以搜索在罗马发生车祸的伤员中存在氯胺酮的情况。方法筛选分析通过单相试验(临界值定为1000 ng / ml)和自动免疫酶分析(临界值定为330 ng / ml)进行。确认测试已经通过气相色谱-质谱法实现。结果单相测试突出显示了294个样品中的十个阳性样品。自动仪器仅确认了十个以前的阳性样品中的六个,同时该仪器又发现了四个阳性样品,单相测试将其视为阴性。气相色谱-质谱法仅在14个筛查结果中的7个样品中证实了氯胺酮的存在。气相色谱-质谱法确认的七分之三样品仅对氯胺酮呈阳性。结论根据法律指示,未检索到氯胺酮:此限制不会使当局能够对违反道路法的行为施加预期的罚款。自动化对于保证毒理学筛查测试的可靠性至关重要,特别是在具有法律意义的意义上。该结果突出显示了进行筛查分析之前,绝对需要执行确认测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号