首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Public Health >Validity and reliability of a new instrument for the evaluation of dental collaboration in disabled people
【24h】

Validity and reliability of a new instrument for the evaluation of dental collaboration in disabled people

机译:一种新的残疾人牙科协作评估工具的有效性和可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: nowadays, oral health in people with disabilities is an important topic. The phsychological and behavioural problems of these people, their difficulties with environmental adaptations and the absence of any traditional communication determine the compliance needed for treatment The aim of this work was to test the validity and reliability of an original questionnaire that could become an instrument assessing the individual features in people with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities at the time of dental treatment. Methods: it was created a questionnaire with standardised answers regarding four specific areas: neuropsychology, emotional-affect, autonomy and environmental resources. The questionnaire was completed by 63 patients from three different institutes (two rehabilitation institutes and an Institute of Dentistry for patients with special needs). To analyse the answers, each item was transformed into a numeric value. A value of 1 was displayed as the minimum while 4 represented full possession of the considered skills. A total of 17 variables were analysed with descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis. Internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Furthermore, an analysis on convergent/discriminant validity was provided. Results: all variables were positively correlated. The most significant were “guidance”, “communication”, “sociability”, “view”, “hearing” and “feeding”. Items like “self-control”, “equanimity”, “problematic behaviour”, “extroversion” and “autonomy” offered vague and less significant information in identifying the patient’s collaboration level. Variables like “evaluation by the compiler about the patient’s collaboration”, “previous dental experiences” and “attendant” were confirmed. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.77 (standardized result), which meet the a priori criterion of 0.90≥alpha≥0.70. Conclusions: the instrument was statistically tested and seems to be adequate to estimate the collaboration level of disabled patients. It is called CLEQ (Collaboration Level Evaluation Questionnaire). Further trials are warranted to confirm its validity and benefits.
机译:背景:当今,残疾人的口腔健康已成为一个重要话题。这些人的心理和行为问题,他们对环境的适应困难以及缺乏任何传统交流决定了治疗所需的依从性。这项工作的目的是检验原始调查表的有效性和可靠性,该调查表可以用作评估疾病的工具。牙科治疗时智障和其他发育障碍患者的个体特征。方法:创建了一个针对四个特定领域的标准化答案的问卷:神经心理学,情感影响,自主权和环境资源。问卷由来自三个不同机构(两个康复机构和一个牙科研究所的特殊需求患者)的63名患者完成。为了分析答案,将每个项目转换为一个数值。最小值为1,而4表示完全拥有所考虑的技能。通过描述性统计和多元分析对总共17个变量进行了分析。内部一致性可靠性是使用Cronbach的alpha来衡量的。此外,提供了收敛/判别效度的分析。结果:所有变量均呈正相关。最重要的是“指导”,“沟通”,“社交性”,“视野”,“听力”和“喂养”。 “自我控制”,“镇静”,“问题行为”,“性格外向”和“自治”等项目在确定患者的协作水平时提供了模糊且不太重要的信息。确认了诸如“编译器对患者协作的评估”,“以前的牙科经历”和“服务员”等变量。 Cronbach的alpha为0.77(标准化结果),满足先验标准0.90≥alpha≥0.70。结论:该仪器经过统计学测试,似乎足以估计残疾患者的协作水平。它被称为CLEQ(协作级别评估问卷)。必须进行进一步的试验以确认其有效性和益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号