...
首页> 外文期刊>Italian journal of pediatrics >Comparison of minor head trauma management in the emergency departments of a United States and Italian Children’s hospital
【24h】

Comparison of minor head trauma management in the emergency departments of a United States and Italian Children’s hospital

机译:美国和意大利儿童医院急诊室中轻微头部创伤处理的比较

获取原文

摘要

Pediatric head trauma management varies between emergency departments globally. Here we aim to compare the pediatric minor head trauma management between a US and Italian hospital. We conducted a retrospective chart review of children 0–18?years old presenting after minor head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale 14–15) from two emergency departments, in Boston, Massachusetts, United States and Trieste, Italy, between January and December 2013. Frequencies of demographic, clinical, and management characteristic were calculated. We compared rate ratios for characteristics of patients receiving cranial computed tomography (CT) scans between the two populations. There were 1783 patients in Boston, Massachusetts and 183 patients in Trieste, Italy. Patients in Boston had more reported neurologic symptoms (61.2%) than in Trieste (6%) (p??0.001). More CT scans were ordered on the patients in Boston (17.3% vs. 6.6%) (p??0.001), while more children were hospitalized in Trieste (55.7% vs. 8.6%) (p??0.001). Patients with neurological symptoms more commonly had a CT scan in Trieste (45.5%) than in Boston (23.5%) (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27, 1.00), while more patients without neurological symptoms had CTs in Boston (7.5%) than in Trieste (4.1%) (RR 1.85, 95% CI 0.86, 4.00). Assignment of triage levels and definitions of head injury severity varied considerably between the two hospitals, resulting in dissimilar populations presenting to the two hospitals, and thus, differences in the management of these children. The population of head trauma patients and the management of pediatric minor head trauma differs between Boston and Trieste, with a preference for CT scans in Boston and a preference for hospitalization in Trieste. Clinical guidelines used at each institution likely lead to this variation in care influenced by the different patient populations and institutional resources.
机译:全球急诊科之间的儿科头部创伤管理有所不同。在这里,我们旨在比较美国和意大利医院的小儿头部头部创伤处理。我们对2013年1月至12月在美国马萨诸塞州波士顿和意大利的里雅斯特的两个急诊科对0-18岁的儿童进行了头部轻微外伤(格拉斯哥昏迷评分14-15)进行了回顾性图表回顾。计算人口统计,临床和管理特征的频率。我们比较了两个人群之间接受颅骨计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描的患者特征的比率。马萨诸塞州波士顿有1783名患者,意大利的里雅斯特有183名患者。在波士顿,患者的神经系统症状(61.2%)比的里雅斯特(6%)多(p <0.001)。波士顿的患者被要求进行更多的CT扫描(17.3%vs. 6.6%)(p <0.001),而的里雅斯特住院的儿童更多(55.7%vs 8.6%)(p 0.001)。有神经系统症状的患者在的里雅斯特(45.5%)比在波士顿(23.5%)的CT扫描更为常见(RR 0.52,95%CI 0.27,1.00),而在波士顿无CT的无神经系统症状的患者(7.5%)的里雅斯特(4.1%)(RR 1.85,95%CI 0.86,4.00)。两家医院之间的分诊级别分配和颅脑损伤严重程度的定义差异很大,导致两家医院的人群有所不同,因此对这些孩子的处理方式也有所不同。在波士顿和的里雅斯特之间,头部外伤患者的人群和小儿头部头部外伤的管理方法有所不同,波士顿偏爱CT扫描,而里雅斯特偏爱住院。每个机构使用的临床指南可能会导致这种护理差异,这取决于不同的患者人群和机构资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号