首页> 外文期刊>Italian Journal of Agronomy >Cereal straw management: a trade-off between energy and agronomic fate
【24h】

Cereal straw management: a trade-off between energy and agronomic fate

机译:谷物秸秆管理:能源与农业命运之间的权衡

获取原文
       

摘要

Climate change mitigation is the most important driving force for bioenergy development. Consequently, the environmental design of bioenergy value chains should address the actual savings of both primary energy demand and greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. According to the EU Renewable Energy Directive (2009/28/EC), no direct impacts and no GHG emissions should be attributed to crop residues (like cereal straws) when they are removed from agricultural land for the purpose of bioenergy utilisation. The carbon neutral assumption applied to crop residues is, however, a rough simplification. Crop residues, indeed, should not be viewed simply as a waste to be disposed, because they play a critical role in sustaining soil organic matter and therefore have an inherent C-capturing value. Moreover, considering straws as an energy feedstock, its status of co-product is clearly recognised and its availability could be obtained according to different cropping systems, corresponding to different primary energy costs and GHG emissions. This paper highlights some hidden features in the assessment of agricultural energy and carbon balance, still very difficult to be detected and accounted for. Although they are frequently disregarded, these features (such as long term dynamic trend of soil organic carbon and annual nitrous oxide emissions from the soil) should be carefully considered in assembling the energy and emission balance. By using a crop simulation model, the long-term soil organic matter and annual N 2 O soil emissions were estimated. Consequently, a comprehensive energy and GHG balance was determined in accordance with the life cycle assessment methodology. Contrasting methods of straw management and wheat cultivation were compared: straw retention vs removal from the soil; conventional vs conservation tillage; wheat cropping system as a single-crop or in rotation. The resulting carbon footprint of straws has different magnitudes with respect to the several experimental conditions. By selecting the best agricultural practices, energy from straw can be optimally coupled with grain productions, without detrimental effects on soil fertility. An improved and specifically tailored cropping system is designed to obtain an optimal trade-off.
机译:缓解气候变化是生物能源发展的最重要动力。因此,生物能源价值链的环境设计应解决一次能源需求和温室气体(GHG)排放的实际节省。根据欧盟可再生能源指令(2009/28 / EC),将作物残渣(例如谷物秸秆)从耕地中移出以用于生物能源利用时,不会造成直接影响,也不应将温室气体排放归因于作物残渣。但是,应用于农作物残渣的碳中性假设是一个粗略的简化。实际上,不应将农作物残渣简单地视为要处理的废物,因为它们在维持土壤有机质中起着至关重要的作用,因此具有固有的碳捕获价值。此外,将秸秆视为一种能源原料,可以清楚地认识到其副产品的状态,并且可以根据不同的耕作制度获得相应的可获得性,这对应于不同的一次能源成本和温室气体排放量。本文重点介绍了农业能源和碳平衡评估中的一些隐藏特征,这些特征仍然很难被发现和解释。尽管经常忽略它们,但在组合能量和排放平衡时,应仔细考虑这些特征(例如土壤有机碳的长期动态趋势和土壤每年产生的一氧化二氮排放量)。通过使用作物模拟模型,估算了长期土壤有机质和每年的N 2 O土壤排放量。因此,根据生命周期评估方法确定了全面的能源和温室气体平衡。比较了秸秆管理和小麦栽培的对比方法:秸秆保留与从土壤中去除;传统耕作与保护性耕作;小麦种植系统为单作或轮作。相对于几个实验条件,所得的秸秆碳足迹具有不同的大小。通过选择最佳的农业实践,可以将秸秆的能源与谷物生产最佳地结合在一起,而不会对土壤肥力产生不利影响。一种经过改进和专门定制的种植系统旨在获得最佳的权衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号