...
首页> 外文期刊>Iranian journal of public health. >Gender Comparisons of Asymmetric Lateralization in Neurodegenerative Disorder Patients via E-Pen Based Cognitive Assessment System
【24h】

Gender Comparisons of Asymmetric Lateralization in Neurodegenerative Disorder Patients via E-Pen Based Cognitive Assessment System

机译:通过基于电子笔的认知评估系统对神经退行性疾病患者进行不对称分型的性别比较

获取原文

摘要

Background: The clinical gender-dependent characteristics of visuospatial neglect between men and women have not been elucidated in Korean patients with cognitive impairment. The goal of this study was to observe the asymmetric lateralization in patients using a novel e-pen based cognitive assessment system. Methods: A total of 31 patients, 16 men and 15 women, with early stage hemispheric cerebral dysfunction were recruited for the assessment of unilateral neglect suing a novice paper-and-pencil based electronic evaluation system from a rehabilitation center of Inha University hospital in 2016. Results were assessed for degrees of deviations, and numbers of neglected lines. Degree of deviation was assessed using the positions and distances from the horizontal line centers. Effect sizes were calculated to assess proximities between the assessed results. Results: Comparatively greater left and rightward biasness for the right-sided and left-sided horizontal lines were observed for the male patients, respectively. Moreover, greater degree of left to rightward biasness was observed as the horizontal lines shortened in both groups. However, the magnitude of biasness in female patients showed comparatively less directional bias, indicating greater prevalence for the center of mass effect in male patients. Conclusion: Gender difference in visuospatial neglect seems to exist with less accuracy in recognition for the bisecting center for the female and asymmetrical lateralization and magnitude of deviation for the male patients.
机译:背景:在韩国认知障碍患者中,男女之间视觉空间忽略的临床性别依赖性特征尚未阐明。这项研究的目的是使用基于电子笔的新型认知评估系统观察患者的不对称侧偏。方法:2016年,由仁荷大学医院康复中心通过新手纸笔电子评估系统,招募了患有早期半球性脑功能障碍的31例患者,男16例,女15例,以评估单侧忽视。评估结果的偏差程度和被忽略的线数。使用与水平线中心的位置和距离评估偏差程度。计算效应大小以评估评估结果之间的接近度。结果:男性患者的右侧和左侧水平线的左,右偏度分别较大。此外,随着两组水平线的缩短,观察到了从左到右的更大程度的偏斜。但是,女性患者的偏倚程度显示出相对较小的方向偏倚,表明男性患者的质心效应患病率较高。结论:视觉空间忽略中的性别差异似乎在识别女性两等分中心和男性患者的不对称侧偏及偏斜幅度方面准确性较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号