首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >Complications of Femoral Lengthening using the Ilizarov Fixator
【24h】

Complications of Femoral Lengthening using the Ilizarov Fixator

机译:使用Ilizarov固定器延长股骨的并发症

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To report and evaluate the complications of femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov fixator.Method: Retrospective study of 10 patients who underwent femoral lengthening between 2001 and 2008. Demographics were collected by reviewing the medical records of each patient.Results: Of 10 patients, seven (70%) were females. Average age was 20 years (range 11 – 48 years). Equal limb lengths were achieved in six patients. Three patients had significant residual leg length discrepancies. Lengthening was discontinued in two patients due to marked restriction in knee flexion. In the other patient lengthening was discontinued due to subluxation of the hip. One patient developed mild subluxation of the knee. One patient sustained a fracture following fixator removal. The fracture healed with a mild leg length discrepancy. All patients developed knee stiffness following lengthening. Nine patients achieved full knee extension and flexion greater than 90?.Conclusion: Generally, the number of complications and failures of lengthening increase in proportion to the length of distraction and the severity of the preoperative problems. Introduction Limb-length discrepancy is not an uncommon problem. Discrepancies of less than 5 centimetre (cm) are conventionally treated by a shoe lift, epiphysiodesis or femoral shortening. Most patients are reluctant to wear a lift greater than 2cm. Discrepancies in excess of 5cm may warrant limb lengthening. With the introduction of more physiologic methods of lengthening pioneered by Ilizarov and based on the biology of bone and soft tissue regeneration under the conditions of tension stress, the bone healing problems have become less common (1, 2). However, the soft tissue problems of decreased joint motion, prolonged or permanent stiffness, joint subluxation, refracture, nerve palsy and infection after lengthening have remained (3 – 8).The author reports his complications following femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov Circular Fixator. Subjects And Methods This is a retrospective study of 10 patients who underwent femoral lengthening utilizing the Ilizarov fixator between 2001 and 2008. Demographics were collected by reviewing the medical records of each patient. The principles for optimization of the regenerate bone were as follows: low energy osteotomy utilizing osteotomes, stable external fixation, latency period of 7 – 10 days, distraction rate of 0.25mm four times per day and a period of consolidation.Physical therapy was started immediately and continued throughout the lengthening period to maintain ranges of motion of the hip and knee. Upon discharge from hospital, patients were given prescriptions for oral antibiotics which were to be taken only if a pin site infection developed. The signs and symptoms of a pin site infection were explained to the patient and relatives. Daily cleaning of pin sites with cotton swabs soaked in normal saline to remove crusts was recommended. Weekly follow-up with plain radiographs to ensure good quality of the regenerate bone was maintained for the first month and then at three-weekly intervals until distraction was complete. Once the distraction phase was complete, patients were usually seen monthly to assess bony consolidation. Rate of distraction was decreased in patients who had poor regenerate bone during the distraction periods. Normal rates of distraction were resumed when radiographs demonstrated good regenerate bone.Two patients (cases 3 and 9) had simultaneous lengthening with correction of angular deformities of the distal femora. Hinges were used to correct the angular deformities and the hinges were replaced by telescopic rods for the lengthening process. The Ilizarov frame was extended across the knee in four patients in whom lengthening greater than 7cm was contemplated. This was performed to prevent knee subluxation and reduce the compression of the articular cartilages.Apparatus removal was performed under general anaesthesia. Routine immobiliz
机译:目的:使用Ilizarov固定器报告和评估股骨延长的并发症。方法:回顾性研究10例2001年至2008年接受股骨延长的患者。通过回顾每位患者的病历收集人口统计资料。结果:10例患者中,七(70%)是女性。平均年龄为20岁(11至48岁)。六名患者达到了相等的肢体长度。三例患者有明显的剩余腿长差异。由于膝盖屈曲明显受限,两名患者中止加长。在另一例患者中,由于髋关节半脱位而停止延长。一名患者出现膝关节半脱位。一名患者在移除固定器后发生了骨折。骨折愈合,腿长有轻度差异。所有患者加长后均出现膝盖僵硬。 9例患者达到了全膝关节伸展和屈曲大于90度。结论:通常,并发症的发生和延长失败的次数与分心时间的长短和术前问题的严重程度成正比。简介肢长差异并不是一个普遍的问题。小于5厘米(cm)的差异通常通过鞋拉,表皮摘除术或股骨缩短术进行处理。大多数患者不愿佩戴大于2厘米的提举。差异超过5厘米可能需要延长肢体。随着Ilizarov开创的更多生理延长方法的引入,并基于在张力应力条件下骨骼和软组织再生的生物学,骨骼愈合问题已变得不那么普遍了(1、2)。但是,软组织的问题仍然存在,即关节运动减少,关节僵硬或延长,半脱位,骨折,神经麻痹以及加长后感染(3 – 8)。作者报告了使用Ilizarov圆形固定器加长股骨后的并发症。受试者和方法这是一项回顾性研究,对2001年至2008年之间使用Ilizarov固定器进行股骨延长术的10例患者进行了回顾。通过回顾每位患者的病历来收集人口统计学信息。优化再生骨的原则如下:利用截骨刀进行低能量截骨术,稳定的外固定,潜伏期为7至10天,每天四次分心率0.25mm和巩固期。立即开始物理治疗。并在整个延长期间持续进行,以保持臀部和膝盖的运动范围。出院后,为患者开具口服抗生素的处方,只有在发生针头部位感染时才可以服用。向患者和亲戚解释了针状部位感染的体征和症状。建议每天用蘸有生理盐水的棉签清洁针部位,以除去硬皮。每周进行一次平片检查,以确保第一个月保持良好的再生骨质量,然后每三个星期间隔一次,直到完成牵引为止。分心阶段完成后,通常每月都要看病人以评估骨合并。在分心期间,再生骨差的患者分心率降低。 X光片显示出良好的再生骨后,恢复正常的分心率。两名患者(病例3和9)同时进行了加长并矫正了股骨远端的角畸形。使用铰链校正角度变形,并用伸缩杆代替铰链以延长长度。 Ilizarov框架在四名预期长度超过7厘米的患者中跨膝盖延伸。这样做是为了防止膝关节半脱位并减少关节软骨的压迫。在全身麻醉下进行器械摘除。常规固定

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号