首页> 外文期刊>Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery >Biomechanical Study. The Role of Osteoporotic or Osteoarthritic Bone in Determining the Fixation Achieved Within the Femoral Head by the Lag Screw Elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade
【24h】

Biomechanical Study. The Role of Osteoporotic or Osteoarthritic Bone in Determining the Fixation Achieved Within the Femoral Head by the Lag Screw Elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade

机译:生物力学研究。动态髋螺钉(DHS)和DHS刀片的滞后螺钉元件在确定股骨头内固定中骨质疏松或骨关节炎的作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective This study was conducted to investigate the fixation that the lag screw elements of two different implants used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures achieve within osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral heads, as a practical means of comparing the mechanical properties of osteoporotic bone against those of osteoarthritic bone. Methods The lag screw elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade were the two lag screws that were chosen to conduct this study with. “Pushout” tests were performed as the means to investigate the fixation that each lag screw achieved within the femoral heads, as the most common mode of failure with these devices is ‘cut-out’ Results The results demonstrate that the difference in mechanical properties between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone in cadaveric femoral heads mean that the devices used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures achieve a much greater fixation within osteoarthritic bone. The results also demonstrate that the overall failure patterns were similar for each device within both the osteoporotic and osteoarthritic bone apart from the large difference in forces achieved. Conclusion The results demonstrate, that as expected when the density of the bone increases, in general the implants achieve better fixation within it. However this study also demonstrates that it is the implant that dictates the pattern of failure and not the bone. Introduction Previous studies by Li, B., Aspden et al [1] and Shih-Sheng Sun et al [2] have been conducted to compare the actual values for the mechanical properties of bone from osteoporotic femoral heads against those of bone from osteoarthritic femoral heads, however our study was performed with a difference perspective, to investigate what this recognised difference in the mechanical properties between osteoarthritic and osteoporotic bone has in practical terms, in relation to implant fixation. Femoral heads were again chosen as the medium to conduct this study in, as they are available post total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty. Two implants used in the treatment of Intertrochanteric fractures were chosen as the means of testing fixation because even though the majority of intertrochanteric fractures occur with osteoporotic bone, some also have been reported with osteoarthritic bone.[3] Another factor worth noting is that there is no one clearly defined value for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a metabolic disease characterised by low bone mass and micro-architectural changes of bone that predispose it to fragility fractures [4]. In essence osteoporosis is a multifactorial chronic disease that may progress silently for decades until characteristic fractures occur late in life.[5] Patients with a bone mineral density of 2.5 standard deviations less than the average value for young adults are said to be opteoporotic.[6] Therefore osteoporosis can exist within a spectrum of values below a certain defined value in the literature.[6] In conducting this experiment with both osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral heads, it may help to demonstrate the role that bone density has on the mechanical properties of bone and ultimately on the fixation achieved within it.‘Cut out’ is the most common mode of failure with the implants chosen for this study. [7] Pushout studies, as previously documentated in the literature,[8,9,10] were chosen as the method of testing to represent ‘Cut out.’ Therefore the purpose of this study was to determine the difference in the mechanical properties between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral heads in practical terms, in relation to the fixation achieved within them by the lag screw elements of two different implants used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Methods The implants chosen to conduct the study with were the lag screw elements of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and DHS Blade, as they are both are placed within the femoral head during the treatment of an intertrochante
机译:目的研究骨质疏松性和骨关节炎性股骨头中两种用于治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的植入物的拉力螺钉钉固定的效果,作为比较骨质疏松性骨与骨关节炎性骨的机械性能的实用手段。方法动态髋关节螺钉(DHS)和DHS刀片的滞后螺钉元件是选择用来进行这项研究的两个滞后螺钉。进行“推力”测试是研究固定在股骨头内的每个拉力螺钉的方法,因为这些设备最常见的失效模式是“切出”。结果表明,两种器械之间的机械性能差异尸体股骨头中的骨质疏松和骨关节炎性骨意味着用于固定股骨转子间骨折的装置在骨关节炎性骨中实现了更大的固定。结果还表明,除了获得的力的巨大差异外,骨质疏松性骨和骨关节炎骨中每个设备的总体故障模式相似。结论结果表明,正如预期的那样,当骨密度增加时,通常植入物会在其中实现更好的固定。但是,这项研究还表明,决定失败模式的是植入物,而不是骨骼。前言Li,B.,Aspden等人[1]和Sunh-Sheng Sun等人[2]进行了先前的研究,以比较骨质疏松性股骨头的骨与骨关节炎性股骨的骨的机械性能的实际值。头,然而,我们的研究是从不同的角度进行的,以调查这种公认的骨关节炎和骨质疏松性骨在机械性能方面与植入物固定有关的机械差异。再次选择股骨头作为进行这项研究的媒介,因为在全髋关节置换或半髋置换术后可以使用它们。选择了两种用于治疗转子间骨折的植入物作为固定测试的方法,因为即使大多数转子间骨折都发生在骨质疏松性骨中,也有一些报道了骨关节炎性骨[3]。另一个值得注意的因素是,没有一个明确定义的骨质疏松症值。骨质疏松症是一种代谢性疾病,其特征是骨量低和骨骼的微结构改变,使骨骼易于发生脆性骨折[4]。从本质上讲,骨质疏松症是一种多因素慢性疾病,可能会沉默数十年,直到特征性骨折发生在生命的晚期。[5]骨矿物质密度小于年轻成年人平均值2.5个标准差的患者被称为视光疏松症。[6]因此,骨质疏松症可能存在于文献中低于某个确定值的一系列值中。[6]在对骨质疏松症和骨关节炎性股骨头进行此实验时,它可能有助于证明骨密度对骨骼的机械性能以及最终在其内固定的作用。“切除”是最常见的失败方式本研究选择的植入物。 [7]文献中先前记载的压出力研究[8,9,10]被选作代表“切出”的测试方法,因此,本研究的目的是确定两者之间的机械性能差异。骨质疏松和骨关节炎股骨头的实用术语,与用于治疗股骨转子间骨折的两种不同植入物的方头螺钉元件在其内部实现的固定有关。方法选择用于进行研究的植入物是动力髋螺钉(DHS)和DHS刀片的拉力螺钉元件,因为在进行股骨转子置换术时,它们都放置在股骨头内

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号